
Codacy
SonarQube
CodeClimate
CodeFactor.io
ESLint
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
codebeat
Feedback Fish
Canny.io
productboard
Freddy Feedback
Incoming Feedback by Hotjar
Emojicom.io
Customer Feedback Portal
Survicate
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis without the hassle.
Codacy
Feedback FishFeedback Fish is particularly recommended for startups, small business owners, web developers, and digital product teams who need a lightweight feedback tool that provides essential features without overwhelming complexity.
No Feedback Fish videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Feedback Fish should be more popular than Codacy. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: over 4 years ago
Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: almost 5 years ago
Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of the mentioned detection tools in this article and we are working every day to improve the service. The other main benefit of using automated code review tools is to allow you to... - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
Because you care and because you always want to be better, automation is a great way to optimize your review workflow process. Go ahead and do a quick search on Google for automated code reviews and see who better fits your workflow. You'll find Codacy on your Google search and we hope you like what we do. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
With three friends, we built and launched a SaaS product over a weekend and live-streamed ourselves doing it[0]: https://feedback.fish It was a ton of fun, about 1,000 people tuned in over the course of those ~60 hours. The product was acquired about a year later. [0]: https://productweekend.live. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
You are literally copying https://feedback.fish/. Source: almost 4 years ago
You can use an embeddable widget like feedback fish or question to have your users report bugs & ideas. Feedback fish lets them take a screenshot, question lets them record a video. Source: over 4 years ago
What about feedback.fish ? What's their UVP and competitive advantage? Source: over 4 years ago
Inspired by feedback.fish much? ;). Source: over 4 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Canny.io - Canny helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
productboard - Beautiful and powerful product management.
CodeFactor.io - Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
Freddy Feedback - Freddy Feedback is a tool to get feedback from your visitors and customers on anything that you communicate to them on your website.