Software Alternatives & Startups

CMDK for Gmail VS Objects

Compare CMDK for Gmail VS Objects and see what are their differences

CMDK for Gmail

CMDK (previously known as Simplehuman) is a browser extension that brings advanced keyboard shortcuts and command bar to Gmail, and teaches how to use them as you use Gmail everyday ⚡️

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $4 / Monthly
Objects

An online tool to create instructions and user manuals for providing quality customer care

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CMDK for Gmail seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 0
Email popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CMDK for Gmail
Objects
Website cmdk.email objects.to
Pricing
Paid Free trial $4 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms
Google Chrome Arc Browser Edge Chromium +2
—
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2023 —
Listed in

About CMDK for Gmail and Objects

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CMDK for Gmail
Objects

Use simpler keyboard shortcuts to navigate through email, archive, delete, switch between email in almost flow-state speeds. It brings the Superhuman shortcut experience right inside Gmail, without costing your $30/month. Features: 1. Superhuman shortcuts right inside Gmail - Esc, Snooze,...

Read more about CMDK for Gmail

No description of Objects yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CMDK for Gmail 3 features
Objects 5 features
  • Advanced keyboard shortcuts
    Keyboard shortcuts to navigate in Gmail - go to Inbox, go to Spam, RSVP to events, unsubscribe from emails.
  • Command bar
    To search for shortcuts and act on your email
  • Inbox Zero
    Non boring screen when you hit inbox zero
  • Decentralized Object Storage
    Objects.to provides decentralized storage solutions, allowing users to store data across distributed networks rather than relying on a single centralized server, which enhances data resilience and reduces single points of failure.
  • Web3 and Blockchain Integration
    The platform is designed with Web3 principles in mind, making it well-suited for developers building decentralized applications (dApps) that need reliable and censorship-resistant storage.
  • Simple API and Developer Experience
    Objects.to offers a straightforward API that makes it relatively easy for developers to integrate decentralized storage into their projects without needing deep expertise in the underlying protocols.
  • Content Persistence
    Data stored through Objects.to benefits from content-addressable storage mechanisms, helping ensure that files remain available and verifiable over time without risk of link rot or unauthorized modification.
  • Cost-Effective Storage
    Compared to traditional cloud storage providers, Objects.to can offer competitive pricing by leveraging decentralized storage networks, potentially reducing costs for developers and businesses storing large amounts of data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Mainstream Adoption
    Objects.to is a relatively niche platform compared to established cloud storage providers like AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage, which means fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations are available.
  • Performance and Latency Concerns
    Decentralized storage can sometimes suffer from higher latency and slower retrieval speeds compared to centralized cloud services that have globally distributed CDNs and optimized infrastructure.
  • Reliability and Uptime Uncertainty
    As a smaller and newer platform, Objects.to may not offer the same level of guaranteed uptime and SLAs that enterprise-grade centralized storage providers commit to.
  • Learning Curve for Non-Web3 Developers
    Developers unfamiliar with decentralized storage concepts, content addressing, and Web3 paradigms may face a steeper learning curve when adopting Objects.to compared to traditional storage solutions.
  • Limited Documentation and Support
    Being a smaller platform, Objects.to may have less comprehensive documentation, fewer support channels, and slower response times for troubleshooting compared to major cloud providers with dedicated support teams.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CMDK for Gmail
Objects

Overall verdict

  • CMDK for Gmail (cmdk.email) is a well-regarded productivity tool that brings keyboard-driven command palette functionality to Gmail, helping users navigate and manage their inbox faster without relying on the mouse.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a Spotlight/command-palette style interface for Gmail, letting you search, navigate, and act on emails quickly
  • Emphasizes keyboard shortcuts, which can significantly speed up common inbox tasks and reduce reliance on the mouse
  • Streamlines email workflows for power users who process high volumes of messages daily
  • Lightweight browser-based approach that integrates directly into the Gmail interface
  • Appeals to those who value efficiency and want to keep their hands on the keyboard

Recommended for

  • Power users and professionals who process large volumes of email daily
  • Keyboard-shortcut enthusiasts who prefer command-palette style navigation
  • Developers, founders, and knowledge workers seeking to speed up inbox management
  • Anyone using Gmail who wants a faster, more efficient email workflow

Overall verdict

  • Objects.to is a niche link-in-bio and personal landing page tool. It appears to offer a minimalist way to consolidate links, but it has limited brand recognition compared to major competitors like Linktree, Bio.link, or Beacons, and detailed independent reviews or long-term reliability data are scarce.

Why this product is good

  • Simple, minimalist interface for creating a single landing page
  • Likely free or low-cost tier for basic use cases
  • Quick setup for consolidating multiple links in one place
  • Lightweight alternative if you dislike bloated link-in-bio tools

Recommended for

  • Individuals wanting a very basic, no-frills link page
  • Users experimenting with alternatives to mainstream link-in-bio services
  • Small creators who don't need advanced analytics or customization
  • Those prioritizing simplicity over extensive design options

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CMDK for Gmail
Objects
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CMDK for Gmail and Objects.

What makes your product unique?

CMDK for Gmail's answer

The only app out there which adds superhuman type keyboard shortcuts to Gmail, without the hefty price of $30/month.

What's the story behind your product?

CMDK for Gmail's answer

I was a user of Superhuman for over 2 years and got tired of paying $30/month. I wanted the best features of Superhuman right inside Gmail, and thats when I started working on this browser extension.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CMDK for Gmail's answer

Javascript, LLMs.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CMDK for Gmail's answer

If you want to continue using Gmail but also want the Superhuman email experience.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CMDK for Gmail's answer

We have executives from Reddit, Netflix, Microsoft, Flipkart using Simplehuman.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CMDK for Gmail's answer

Small business owners, founders, executive assistants, sales reps. Anyone who uses email a lot in their day.

User comments

Share your experience with using CMDK for Gmail and Objects. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CMDK for Gmail 1 mention
Objects 0 mentions

Tracking Objects since Apr 2021.

Alternatives to CMDK for Gmail and Objects

When comparing CMDK for Gmail and Objects, you can also consider the following products.