CMake VS Standard Notes

CMake Reviews

Standard Notes Reviews

CMake mentions (51)

• Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.

  CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• My first Software Release using GitHub Release

  When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• A little help for a C++ newbie

  Install the CMake program using your system package manager, e.g. Sudo apt-get install cmake. Source: 8 months ago

• Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows

  Oh I just assumed it was talking about the one from cmake.org since I was having trouble. I can now confirm that mingw-w64-cmake and the binary from cmake.org do operate in mostly identical ways. Source: about 1 year ago

• Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows

  Then looking at any one of the many examples provided on cmake.org, it's clearly a viable way to do set(CMAKE_*), (e.g., set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11) Set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED True)). Of course, another way to set these variables is to use the -D flag as you suggested, but I was just wondering why you would prohibit using set(CMAKE_*). Source: about 1 year ago

Standard Notes mentions (128)

• Show HN: Text Lambda, a versatile notebook for your personal data

  This certainly could be useful for me personally, but it would need more functionality. I think the _full_ project could be very useful though. However I would ask, how is this different from e.g. https://standardnotes.com/ and other note systems available ? - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• A rant: improve your comms Evernote. Oh and bye.

  Standard Notes - Fully Private and Secure with Multiple different Editors and Backup options including Self hosting. Source: 6 months ago

• Evernote will restrict free users to 50 notes starting December 4

  I've been using Standard Notes'[0] free tier for a while now without issues. Far superior to Evernote. And apparently EN uses your data for machine learning so they can monetize their free users. Standard operating procedure. [0] https://standardnotes.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• ⟳ 4 apps added, 72 updated at f-droid.org

  Standard Notes (version 3.178.0): An end-to-end encrypted note-taking app for digitalists and professionals. Source: 7 months ago

• Beaver Notes: A Privacy-Focused Open-Source Note-Taking App

  - How do I get my data OUT of this thing, if I decide it isn’t right for me? C) If you’re going to go down the “unlike other note-taking platforms” route, it might be valuable to explicitly help people make the comparison in terms of features/approaches/architecture/trade-offs etc. How should one compare this against [Obsidian](https://obsidian.md)? [Simplenote](https://simplenote.com)?... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago