Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

CMake VS QuickBuild

Compare CMake VS QuickBuild and see what are their differences

CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
QuickBuild

QuickBuild is a continuous integration and deployment server.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
ReleasePad
Changelog software that turns GitHub commits into release notes your users actually see — inside your app. Built for founders and teams who ship fast. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CMake seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 55 times since March 2021.

social mentions
55 vs 0
Front End Package Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
112 vs 29

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CMake
QuickBuild
Website cmake.org pmease.com
Pricing —
Official pricing
Listed in
Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools Package Manager +1
DevOps Tools Continuous Integration Continuous Deployment IT Automation +1

About CMake and QuickBuild

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CMake
QuickBuild

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Read more about CMake

No description of QuickBuild yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CMake 5 features
QuickBuild 0 features
  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CMake
QuickBuild

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Overall verdict

  • QuickBuild is a solid, mature continuous integration and continuous delivery tool that stands out for its flexible pipeline configuration, built-in version control browsing, and scalability for complex build environments, making it a good choice for teams needing a self-hosted, highly customizable CI/CD solution.

Why this product is good

  • Supports complex build dependency graphs and pipeline visualization, making it easier to manage multi-stage builds
  • Flexible enough to integrate with a wide range of version control systems including Git, SVN, Mercurial, and Perforce
  • Offers built-in high availability and clustering support for scaling across large teams or distributed environments
  • Provides granular access control and audit trails suitable for enterprise governance requirements
  • Extensible via plugins and scriptable steps for custom workflows
  • Self-hosted option gives organizations more control over data and infrastructure compared to SaaS-only alternatives

Recommended for

  • Enterprises needing on-premise CI/CD with strong access control and auditing
  • Teams managing complex, multi-step build pipelines with interdependencies
  • Organizations using diverse version control systems that need unified CI/CD tooling
  • DevOps teams requiring scalability and high availability for large-scale build infrastructure
  • Companies wanting a highly customizable alternative to Jenkins with better out-of-box UI/UX

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CMake 3 videos + Add
QuickBuild 3 videos + Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos

  • - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Airfix QuickBuild F-35 Lightning II Build and Review (JUST RELEASED!!) J6040

More videos

  • - Airfix QuickBuild Ford Mustang GT Build and Review 2021 New Release
  • - Airfix Bugatti Yeyron quickbuild review

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CMake
QuickBuild
100% 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Continuous Deployment
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using CMake and QuickBuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CMake 55 mentions
QuickBuild 0 mentions
  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking QuickBuild since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to CMake and QuickBuild

When comparing CMake and QuickBuild, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...