Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

CMake VS OpenCL

Compare CMake VS OpenCL and see what are their differences

CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
OCL
OpenCL

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Language Extensions

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CMake seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 55 times since March 2021.

social mentions
55 vs 0
Front End Package Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
154 vs 10

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CMake
OCL
OpenCL
Website cmake.org en.wikipedia.org
Listed in
Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools Package Manager +1
Data Science And Machine Learning Data Science Tools Application And Data Software Libraries +1

About CMake and OpenCL

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CMake
OCL
OpenCL

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Read more about CMake

No description of OpenCL yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CMake 5 features
OCL
OpenCL 0 features
  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CMake
OCL
OpenCL

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

No analysis of OpenCL yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CMake 3 videos + Add
OCL
OpenCL 3 videos + Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos

  • - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Episode 1: What is OpenCL™?

More videos

  • - Harnessing the POWER of Your Graphics Card💪 | An Introduction to OpenCL
  • - Kindle Fire HD Running OpenCL: Engadget Eyes On Review!

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CMake
OCL
OpenCL
100% 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
Application And Data
100% 100%
100% 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Data Science Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using CMake and OpenCL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CMake 55 mentions
OCL
OpenCL 0 mentions
  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more

Tracking OpenCL since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to CMake and OpenCL

When comparing CMake and OpenCL, you can also consider the following products.

  • GNU Make

    GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

    Compare GNU Make to CMake or OpenCL:

    GNU Make vs CMake GNU Make vs OpenCL
  • Extism

    Extism is the open source, universal plug-in system. Extend all the software everywhere! Powered by WebAssembly.

    Compare Extism to CMake or OpenCL:

    Extism vs CMake Extism vs OpenCL
  • SCons

    SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

    Compare SCons to CMake or OpenCL:

    SCons vs CMake SCons vs OpenCL
  • OpenCV

    OpenCV is the world's biggest computer vision library

    Compare OpenCV to CMake or OpenCL:

    OpenCV vs CMake OpenCV vs OpenCL
  • SBT

    SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

    Compare SBT to CMake or OpenCL:

    SBT vs CMake SBT vs OpenCL
  • TensorFlow

    TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning framework designed and published by Google. It tracks data flow graphs over time. Nodes in the data flow graphs represent machine learning algorithms. Read more about TensorFlow.

    Compare TensorFlow to CMake or OpenCL:

    TensorFlow vs CMake TensorFlow vs OpenCL
Loading...