Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CMake VS Currents

Compare CMake VS Currents and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

CMake logo CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Currents logo Currents

Alternative Cypress Dashboard - record, debug and analyze your cypress tests for less.
  • CMake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-21

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

  • Currents Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-21

CMake features and specs

  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages of CMake

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Currents features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of CMake

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Analysis of Currents

Overall verdict

  • Currents (currents.dev) is a solid, developer-focused test analytics and orchestration platform that works well for teams running Cypress and Playwright at scale, offering parallelization, flaky test detection, and CI insights as a modern alternative to the Cypress Dashboard.

Why this product is good

  • Provides test parallelization and orchestration to speed up CI/CD pipelines
  • Strong support for popular end-to-end testing frameworks like Cypress and Playwright
  • Offers flaky test detection and detailed analytics to improve test reliability
  • Integrates smoothly with common CI providers such as GitHub Actions, GitLab, CircleCI, and Jenkins
  • Often more cost-effective and flexible than the native Cypress Cloud dashboard
  • Helps teams identify slow, failing, or unstable tests to optimize their suites

Recommended for

  • Development teams running large Cypress or Playwright test suites
  • Organizations needing test parallelization to reduce CI run times
  • QA and engineering teams looking to reduce and monitor flaky tests
  • Companies seeking a cost-effective alternative to Cypress Cloud
  • DevOps teams integrating test analytics into CI/CD pipelines

CMake videos

+ Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

  • Review - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert โ€œUsing Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Designโ€
  • Review - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Currents videos

+ Add

Tame Impala - Currents ALBUM REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - Why CURRENTS is the Perfect Break Up Record
  • Review - Tame Impala - Currents vinyl album review | Vinyl Rewind

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CMake and Currents)

CMake

Currents

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CMake and Currents. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CMake seems to be a lot more popular than Currents. While we know about 55 links to CMake, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Currents. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CMake mentions (55)

  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Creating a Native Desktop GUI Using C++ with GTK
    I used CMAKE to define the build configurations. I find it very convenient that CMAKE generates the Makefile on Linux and can also create a Visual Studio project on Windows. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.
    CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

Currents mentions (3)

  • Scaling Cypress Tests: Parallelise your End-to-End Tests with Testkube
    Cypress offers features like test parallelization and analytics that help teams quicken their testing process. While initially expensive, it now has a free tier with limitations on the number of parallel tests you can run. To overcome this barrier, open-source alternatives like SorryCypress and managed solutions like Currents.dev emerged, offering unlimited parallelization and features previously exclusive to... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: SaaS pricing pages with high prices and not โ€œcontact salesโ€
    Currents.dev has 12 pricing levels, ranging from $40/mo to $1170/mo, until you hit the "contact us" phase: https://currents.dev/#pricing. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Launch HN: DeploySentinel (YC S22) โ€“ End-to-end tests that don't flake
    Neat work and congrats on the launch! Speaking of Cypress Dashboard drop-in replacement: https://currents.dev is a must-be-mentioned tool! As well as the open source and free https://sorry-cypress.dev Sorry for the shameless plug :) We have also been working for a while on time travelling. Hoping to share some results soon - your work is very inspiring. Great to see such a variety of tools that make CI testing... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CMake and Currents, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

TestDino - An AI-native, Playwright-focused test reporting and management platform with MCP support. It lets developers use Claude Code, Cursor, or other LLM tools to query reports, analyze flaky tests, compare runs, manage suites in natural language

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

Report Portal - AI-powered Test Automation Dashboard

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Testomatio - Testomat.io โ€” Test Management System for automated tests. A powerful solution to keep and sync your automated and manual tests in one place, provides to make testing activities completely visible and transparent for all teammates Dev, PM, BA

Loading...