
Cloudback.it
BackHub
GitProtect.io
GitHub
Amazon S3
Active@ Disk Image
XetHub
Codekeeper
GitBook
Mintlify
Docusaurus
ReadMe
Archbee.io
Confluence
Git
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
We offer the most comprehensive backup on the market. Cloudback lets you store all the information you need to restore the entire repository in the event of a disaster. Back up the GitHub repository code, issues, labels, comments, milestones, etc.
You can set up a flexible schedule for each repository. Cloudback then automatically backs up the repositories according to the schedule. You can also manually trigger a backup at any time.
Reduce storage costs while using your own storage. Learn more
Learn more about Cloudback features in our documentation
Cloudback.it
GitBookNo Cloudback.it videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Cloudback.it's answer
Simplicity and user-friendliness, from the UX to the backup archive.
Cloudback.it's answer
1) Pricing policy - per repository, not per seats. 2) User-friendly backup archives. End user can take an archive and restore even manually. 3) Easy to use, the simplified UI and UX, without heavy enterprise-focused routines (but still all features are in place).
Cloudback.it's answer
It is Azure-hosted .NET core application, built with security in mind.
Based on our record, GitBook should be more popular than Cloudback.it. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If you were using GitHub Desktop, then the file should be in the recycle bin. See this SO answer for more details. You can also try using git restore command. Finally, you can use backup tools like Cloudback to protect your repositories in the future. This will not help you to restore the local changes from your computer, but still can be useful in case of any wrong changes done to your repository. Source: over 3 years ago
GitBook is simple and clean, and sometimes that’s exactly what you need. I like it for early-stage products or teams with lighter documentation. You’ll eventually hit limits if your structure gets more complex, but if simplicity is your priority, it’s a solid choice. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook — a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
BackHub - Backup and archive your GitHub repositories with BackHub. Find us on the GitHub Marketplace.
Mintlify - The AI-powered documentation writer. It's documentation that just appears as you build
GitProtect.io - Fully manageable, most professional GitHub and Bitbucket backup
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
ReadMe - A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.