
Claude Code auto-fix
claude-devtools
/dev for Claude Code
Curated tools and agents, a tuned global CLAUDE.md, and a one-paste master prompt that upgrades your Claude Code from 10% to its full potential.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Hunter.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 155 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | clockedcode.com | hunter.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from France |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ClockedCode is a curated, pre-wired Claude Code setup that saves you the 26+ hours of research it takes to assemble one yourself. It bundles the MCP servers, skills, plugins, hooks, tuned subagents, and a global CLAUDE.md that the maker uses every day - all hand-picked and tested to work together...
No description of Hunter.io yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No ClockedCode videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
GTA Hunter Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using ClockedCode and Hunter.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ClockedCode yet. Be the first one to post
Hunter, Lusha, and LeadIQ all have free plans. Among paid plans on monthly billing, LeadIQ Pro starts at $20 a month for up to 5 users, and Hunter Starter starts at €49 a month.The cheapest option depends on whether...
Hunter, on the other hand, is built around email discovery, verification, and cold email sequencing. It doesn’t automate LinkedIn actions, but instead helps you find and validate professional email addresses and run...
I tested the waterfall enrichment to understand how it works. Clay pulls the data you need from over 100 sources. Say you want to find your prospect’s valid email address, Clay scans various sources like Hunter,...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking ClockedCode since Jun 2026.
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
The real conclusion I'd push back on from every vendor comparison I've read: there is no single tool that solves reverse lookup at 80%+ accuracy with clean data. The waterfall is the answer. The question is whether you build it yourself... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Last year I ran the same LinkedIn Sales Navigator export through three enrichment APIs. Apollo matched 61% of the emails. Hunter.io matched 54%. An OSINT-first pipeline I'd built in n8n — pulling from public sources before hitting any... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
When comparing ClockedCode and Hunter.io, you can also consider the following products.
Auto-fix PRs in the cloud while you stay hands-off
Compare Claude Code auto-fix to ClockedCode or Hunter.io:

Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Compare Apollo.io to ClockedCode or Hunter.io:

See everything Claude Code hides from your terminal
Compare claude-devtools to ClockedCode or Hunter.io:


Claude Code as a Tech Lead with parallel Worker Agents
Compare /dev for Claude Code to ClockedCode or Hunter.io:

Snov.io is a multichannel lead generation and outreach automation platform that helps B2B teams find qualified leads, automate email and LinkedIn campaigns, and manage deals in one built-in CRM.
Compare Snov.io to ClockedCode or Hunter.io: