
Kickbacks.ai
AI Perks
Turn your AI coding agent's spinner wait-state into income. One opt-in sponsored line developers keep 50% in USDC on Solana. Free, $15–$60/mo.

Commits.io
Buoylog
Patchlog
ShipRelay.io
FeedLog
SnipNotes
Changelogs.gallery
Generate changelogs from commits

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Commitlog seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | claudearn.fun | github.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Commitlog yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Claudearn Promo video
No Commitlog videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing claudearn.fun and Commitlog.
claudearn.fun's answer
claudearn monetizes a surface nobody else has claimed: the "thinking" spinner of AI coding agents.
claudearn.fun's answer
Existing dev-ad networks (EthicalAds, Carbon Ads, daily.dev, CodeFund) place ads on websites and newsletters and pay the publisher. claudearn is the first to put a single line inside the AI agent's spinner — where the developer actually is — and shares ~50% with the developer doing the waiting. Opt-in, on-chain USDC payouts, and zero code access. It pays the person, not just the site.
claudearn.fun's answer
Two-sided: - Developers who use AI coding agents (VS Code, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex) and want honest side income from the idle seconds they're already spending. - Advertisers — dev-tool, API, and infrastructure companies that want to reach developers directly inside their editor, in context.
claudearn.fun's answer
The wait-state — those idle seconds watching an AI agent think — is the most wasted attention in software. Nobody owned it. Two things changed: AI coding agents made that pause frequent and predictable, and on-chain USDC made tiny payouts practical for the first time. claudearn turns that overlooked moment into honest side income for developers and a clean, in-context channel for advertisers.
claudearn.fun's answer
claudearn.fun's answer
Honest answer — I won't invent names. claudearn is newly launched, so there are no marquee customers to claim yet. It's built for two groups: developers running AI coding agents who opt in to earn, and developer-focused advertisers (dev tools, APIs, DevRel teams) on the demand side.
Share your experience with using claudearn.fun and Commitlog. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking claudearn.fun since Jun 2026.
Now those are basically all the commands I use, git log would be another but then I use commitlog now so that's out of the picture for most part right now. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
I was talking about building useful stuff for people to use, that reminds me commitlog reached about 48 stars at the time of writing this, so that's really nice but let's see if I can build a lot more tools that work well in everyone's... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
When comparing claudearn.fun and Commitlog, you can also consider the following products.
Get paid to wait for Claude Code to finish
Compare Kickbacks.ai to claudearn.fun or Commitlog:

Create a poster for your office using your code
Compare Commits.io to claudearn.fun or Commitlog:

Get up to $7M in AI credits from 200+ tools including OpenAI ($50K), Anthropic ($25K), Cursor ($1.2K). Free for startups. Join 10,000+ founders saving on AI.
Compare AI Perks to claudearn.fun or Commitlog:

Buoylog turns the GitHub PRs you merge into AI-categorized release notes, publishing them to a hosted changelog page with an in-app widget and email digests.
Compare Buoylog to claudearn.fun or Commitlog: