
Kickbacks.ai
AI Perks
Turn your AI coding agent's spinner wait-state into income. One opt-in sponsored line developers keep 50% in USDC on Solana. Free, $15–$60/mo.

Scrimba
Data Protocol
GoIT LMS
Codelita
CodeCrafters
Codecademy
Divize
The most fun way to learn to code.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Codédex seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | claudearn.fun | codedex.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Codédex yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Claudearn Promo video
No Codédex videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing claudearn.fun and Codédex.
claudearn.fun's answer
claudearn monetizes a surface nobody else has claimed: the "thinking" spinner of AI coding agents.
claudearn.fun's answer
Existing dev-ad networks (EthicalAds, Carbon Ads, daily.dev, CodeFund) place ads on websites and newsletters and pay the publisher. claudearn is the first to put a single line inside the AI agent's spinner — where the developer actually is — and shares ~50% with the developer doing the waiting. Opt-in, on-chain USDC payouts, and zero code access. It pays the person, not just the site.
claudearn.fun's answer
Two-sided: - Developers who use AI coding agents (VS Code, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex) and want honest side income from the idle seconds they're already spending. - Advertisers — dev-tool, API, and infrastructure companies that want to reach developers directly inside their editor, in context.
claudearn.fun's answer
The wait-state — those idle seconds watching an AI agent think — is the most wasted attention in software. Nobody owned it. Two things changed: AI coding agents made that pause frequent and predictable, and on-chain USDC made tiny payouts practical for the first time. claudearn turns that overlooked moment into honest side income for developers and a clean, in-context channel for advertisers.
claudearn.fun's answer
claudearn.fun's answer
Honest answer — I won't invent names. claudearn is newly launched, so there are no marquee customers to claim yet. It's built for two groups: developers running AI coding agents who opt in to earn, and developer-focused advertisers (dev tools, APIs, DevRel teams) on the demand side.
Share your experience with using claudearn.fun and Codédex. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking claudearn.fun since Jun 2026.
I'm a new coder too. What helps me is finding a good place to learn the most basic principles and having 2-5 things I want to do. I started with codedex.io , learning Python and HTML and then took their courses and moved on looking for... Source: over 3 years ago
I think you should focus on HTML, CSS, and JS, starting with HTML. I just started HTML on a website called codedex.io. Pretty cool so far but I feel like I'm getting into a brand new thing haha. Source: over 3 years ago
I've been learning Python on a website called codedex.io for about 6 months. It's been great for me so far. I just started on Classes and Objects. Give them a try, you might like them. Source: over 3 years ago
When comparing claudearn.fun and Codédex, you can also consider the following products.
Get paid to wait for Claude Code to finish
Compare Kickbacks.ai to claudearn.fun or Codédex:

Interactive coding screencasts created in an instant
Compare Scrimba to claudearn.fun or Codédex:

Get up to $7M in AI credits from 200+ tools including OpenAI ($50K), Anthropic ($25K), Cursor ($1.2K). Free for startups. Join 10,000+ founders saving on AI.
Compare AI Perks to claudearn.fun or Codédex:
