
Mem0
cognee
Agentmemory
Memori
Supermemory
ChainMemory
OpenMemory
The missing memory layer for AI products.

Automated software dependency project health tracking

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Deadpendency seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | claiv.io | deadpendency.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Claiv Memory and Deadpendency. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Claiv Memory since Mar 2026.
I created a tiny startup in Haskell which failed RIP. I decided to open source the code though. Source: over 3 years ago
I sometimes stream my Haskell work on deadpendency - https://www.twitch.tv/alistairbuzz. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing Claiv Memory and Deadpendency, you can also consider the following products.

Your private, local memory layer for all AI tools
Compare Mem0 to Claiv Memory or Deadpendency:


Persistent memory for Claude Code, Codex & coding agents
Compare Agentmemory to Claiv Memory or Deadpendency:

Persistent memory from agent trace, not just conversation
Compare Memori to Claiv Memory or Deadpendency:
ai second brain for all your saved stuff
Compare Supermemory to Claiv Memory or Deadpendency:

Portable, verifiable memory for AI agents — works across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and any MCP client
Compare ChainMemory to Claiv Memory or Deadpendency: