CKEditor 4 VS cppq

• Autocomplete
• Code snippets
• Easy Image
  Premium
• Emoji support
• Export to PDF
  Premium
• Image plugins
• Math formulas
  Premium
• Media embeds
• @Mentions
• Paste from Word, Excel and Google Docs
• Spreadsheets
  Premium
• Tables support with columns resizing, selecting rows and columns
• Widgets

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

• Show HN: Tilepieces – An open source project to visually editing HTML documents

  However, I think Ckeditor is (https://ckeditor.com/). You can find it in component format for tilepieces in the project https://github.com/tilepieces/component-examples. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

• Pls, help it doesn't know why is showing an error on collectstatic. I tried everything that goes over every possible article which I found but nothing helped and I don't want to build the projects from zero since I already give 6 hours to set up it for the production server.

  It's CK Editor, a WYSIWYG text editor (a frontend component, so you wouldn't see it in your requirements.txt). I assume you're using it in a template somewhere? Otherwise why would collectstatic be looking for it? Source: over 4 years ago

• Justnote - A privacy-focused note taking app built on Stacks

  Powered by one of the best rich text editor: CKEditor, all editing features like bold, underline, font color, and background color are supported. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.