
Citely
Verify academic references, recover missing DOIs, and inspect evidence from Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and arXiv before publication.

Evernote
OneNote
Notion
Todoist
Simplenote
Standard Notes
Joplin
Capture notes, share them with others, and access them from your computer, phone or tablet. Free with a Google account.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | citewise.dev | google.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2026 | Startup from the United States |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


CiteWise checks whether an academic reference resolves to the correct scholarly work, compares metadata across trusted sources, recovers missing DOI information, and shows field-level evidence before publication.
No description of Google Keep yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of CiteWise.dev yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Google Keep is recommended for individuals who need a basic, user-friendly note-taking tool without excess features. It is particularly beneficial for users who are frequent users of other Google services, as it offers seamless integration. It's an ideal choice for students, professionals, or anyone needing to keep quick, organized notes and lists.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Citewise Demo
Google Keep, Simple and Clean Note-taking App 2018
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing CiteWise.dev and Google Keep.
CiteWise.dev's answer
CiteWise checks whether a reference points to a real scholarly work, and it shows the evidence behind each result. It doesn’t format citations. For every reference you see which fields matched (title, authors, year, publication, DOI), which conflicted, and which source records each result came from. Matching is done by deterministic, field-by-field scoring against Crossref, DataCite, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, PubMed and arXiv. An LLM only helps parse messy input and never decides whether a reference is real.
CiteWise.dev's answer
Most citation tools either generate formatted references or give a yes/no “fake or real” answer. CiteWise gives you the evidence and leaves the decision to you: field-level matches, metadata and DOI conflicts, check completeness, and publication updates such as retractions where available. You can audit a whole bibliography (paste it, or import BibTeX, RIS, EndNote or CSL-JSON), record review decisions, and export HTML, CSV or JSON reports. A free account includes 10 checks per month.
CiteWise.dev's answer
Researchers, graduate students, librarians and academic editors who need to confirm a bibliography is accurate before submission. This includes people checking references suggested by ChatGPT or other AI writing tools, and anyone who has to verify a long reference list without opening every DOI by hand.
CiteWise.dev's answer
AI writing tools made it easy to produce references that look correct but point to the wrong paper, or to no paper at all. Checking them by hand means resolving DOIs and comparing titles, authors and years one at a time. I built CiteWise to automate that lookup while keeping the evidence visible. Early on I tried letting an LLM judge whether a reference was real and dropped the idea: LLMs are good at producing things that look right, which is the same problem that creates fake citations. CiteWise now uses deterministic matching against scholarly databases, and the LLM is limited to helping parse messy input.
CiteWise.dev's answer
Java 17 and Spring Boot 3 on the backend, Next.js 15 on the frontend, PostgreSQL on Supabase, Clerk for authentication and Creem for payments. Reference data comes from the Crossref, DataCite, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, PubMed and arXiv APIs.
CiteWise.dev's answer
CiteWise launched in November 2026 and doesn’t have named customers yet Early users are individual researchers and students
A few notes. I didn’t make up any customer names for the last question, because you have about 8 registered users and none of them are paying yet. Listing made-up institutions on a directory site is easy to get caught on, and it damages credibility. If the form won’t accept that answer, you can leave it blank. The story answer is a draft based on the LLM bug you wrote about in your dev.to post, so replace it with your real reasons for starting the project, like a personal experience or what your classmates went through. Specific details make it more convincing.
Share your experience with using CiteWise.dev and Google Keep. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of CiteWise.dev yet. Be the first one to post
No, Google is not discontinuing Google Keep. They ended support for the Google Keep Chrome app in early 2021 and encouraged users to migrate to the web version of Keep.
Google Keep has most of what you need in a note-taking app; to-do lists, audio notes, a web clipper, and images. In addition, you can archive notes to achieve a cleaner interface.
Google Keep Notes has long been a popular note-taking app for its simplicity and versatility. However, if you're looking for something different or need additional features, there are several free alternatives that...
When comparing CiteWise.dev and Google Keep, you can also consider the following products.

AI citation checker and academic source finder for verifying references, detecting fake ChatGPT citations, and finding sources for research claims.
Compare Citely to CiteWise.dev or Google Keep:

Bring your life's work together in one digital workspace. Evernote is the place to collect inspirational ideas, write meaningful words, and move your important projects forward.
Compare Evernote to CiteWise.dev or Google Keep: