CircleCI Reviews

Netdata Reviews

CircleCI mentions (83)

• Alternatives to GitHub Actions for self-hosted runners

  CircleCI is another popular and mature platform, with extensive support for plugins / reusable workflows in the form of "orbs". - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• GitHub Actions Has a Package Manager, and It Might Be the Worst

  Everyone is free to use alternative CI/CD workflow pipelines. These are often better than Github Actions. There include - https://circleci.com/ - https://www.travis-ci.com/ - Gitlab Anyone can complain as much as they want, but unless they put the money where their mouth is, it's just noise. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• How to Deploy a Full Stack App to Koyeb Using Docker Compose and CircleCI

  CircleCI Account: You need an active CircleCI account connected to your GitHub repository where the application code resides. If you don’t have one, sign up at circleci.com. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• Automate Vector Database Update with AWS and CircleCI

  In this guide, you will explore how to build a fully automated pipeline for processing and updating a vector database using AWS Lambda and CircleCI. The solution involves extracting text from PDFs, generating embeddings with OpenAI, and storing them in Zilliz Cloud, a managed vector database. You will also set up AWS infrastructure (S3, ECR, and Lambda) and implement a CI/CD pipeline with CircleCI to automate... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

• CI/CD Is Your Code’s Nervous System, Your App Doesn’t Ship Without It

  CircleCI: Still solid, but watch pricing and concurrency limits. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Netdata mentions (6)

• From Netdata Inspiration to SaaS MVP: Server Monitoring with Bun + Claude Code Opus 4.6

  If you've ever set up Netdata, you know that feeling — hundreds of real-time charts, per-second granularity, metrics you didn't even know your kernel exposed. It's a wonderful piece of software, genuinely one of the best open-source monitoring tools out there. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Trying to decide best practices for production environment

  Pros are instant HA and Migration. Cons are huge bandwidth hits. With your 4x1gbe you would be maxed out on replicating those 25 VMs. You wouldn't have anything for users. I have a test lab with 4 nodes, 22cpu 100gbram and 30tb space, using low end stuff, 12hdds. Proxmox, ceph dashboard, (the native ceph dashboard you can turn on), and a netdata.cloud account. So I watch it like a hawk and like to load test. Source: over 3 years ago

• Ask HN: Reducing the maintenance surface area of hosting a small internal app

  Docker-compose, not k8s. Set up a script to update the OS, pull all your containers and reboot after hours once a week or once a day. Make sure the script specifies non interactive. Set up alerting for low disk space, see https://netdata.cloud or use your own tool. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

• What’s your preferred stack?

  There can be some issues if you mix and match elastic versions, wazuh versions, logstash versions. But the documentation guides you very well with matrix of what is and is not compatible. You will want a beefy VM to run it in, I started smaller than I should of, and after running a while it kind of puked on itself, certain things would randomly stop working. After giving it 32GB RAM, plenty of disk 4TB, and 8... Source: almost 5 years ago

• Netdata on MacOS

  $ brew info netdata Netdata: stable 1.29.3 (bottled) Diagnose infrastructure problems with metrics, visualizations & alarms Https://netdata.cloud/ Not installed From: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/HEAD/Formula/netdata.rb License: GPL-3.0-or-later ==> Dependencies Build: autoconf ✘, automake ✘, pkg-config ✔ Required: json-c ✘, libuv ✘, lz4 ✘, openssl@1.1 ✔ ==> Caveats To start netdata: brew... Source: almost 5 years ago