Chocolatey
Ninite
Scoop
Homebrew
Just Install
Patch My PC
OneGet
PDQ Deploy
BrowserStack
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
Sauce Labs
CrossBrowserTesting
Selenium
browserling
Ghost Inspector
Katalon
BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platformโand at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.
Chocolatey BrowserStackBased on our record, Chocolatey seems to be a lot more popular than BrowserStack. While we know about 257 links to Chocolatey, we've tracked only 8 mentions of BrowserStack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Package managers like Chocolatey (Windows), APT (Linux), and Homebrew simplify software installation and management. They keep your tools up-to-date and reduce dependency conflicts. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
It looks like using Chocolatey [1] saved me from this attack vector because maintainers hardcode SHA256 checksums (and choco doesn't use WinGuP at all). [1]: https://chocolatey.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/package-manager/winget/ https://chocolatey.org https://scoop.sh Just in case you donโt know about these. :). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Package managers โ With tools like Scoop or Chocolatey, installing dev tools on Windows feels almost like using apt or brew. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
While the ArchWSL and Fedora WSL at MS Store may seem great at first before installing, these distros have often showed compatibility issues and sometimes very weird bugs; even conflicts with scoop or chocolatey apps. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 3 years ago
For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 3 years ago
I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 3 years ago
Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) - Worldโs first full-stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform.
Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows
Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.