Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Chef VS Broadcom AutoSys

Compare Chef VS Broadcom AutoSys and see what are their differences

SuperOps
Modern PSA and RMM Software for MSP's and IT Teams featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Chef logo Chef

Automation for all of your technology. Overcome the complexity and rapidly ship your infrastructure and apps anywhere with automation.

Broadcom AutoSys logo Broadcom AutoSys

AutoSys Workload Automation enhances visibility and control of complex workloads across platforms, ERP systems, and the cloud to help reduce cost and complexity.
  • Chef Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Broadcom AutoSys Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-11-04

Chef features and specs

  • Scalability
    Chef is designed to manage configurations of large numbers of nodes, making it highly scalable for enterprise environments.
  • Flexibility
    Chef uses Ruby-based DSLs (domain-specific languages), which provide a high degree of flexibility to configure complex and custom configurations.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Chef has a strong community and a rich ecosystem of tools and plugins, making it easier to find support and additional resources.
  • Test-driven Development
    Chef supports test-driven development (TDD) and has tools like ChefSpec and Test Kitchen that allow testing of configuration recipes before deployment.
  • Consistency
    Chef ensures that configurations are consistently applied across nodes, reducing the chances of configuration drift.

Possible disadvantages of Chef

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Chef uses a Ruby-based DSL which can be challenging for those not familiar with Ruby, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Complexity
    The powerful and flexible nature of Chef can sometimes lead to complexity, making it difficult to manage for simpler applications.
  • Cost
    While there is an open-source version, the enterprise edition of Chef can be costly, which might be a concern for smaller organizations.
  • Performance Overheads
    Because Chef performs a wide range of operations, there can be performance overheads, especially when managing a vast number of nodes.
  • Dependency Management
    Chef’s dependency management can become cumbersome, as it sometimes requires intricate detail handling to ensure all dependencies are met.

Broadcom AutoSys features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Chef

Overall verdict

  • Chef is a robust and widely used configuration management tool that is well-regarded in the industry.

Why this product is good

  • Chef, developed by Opscode, provides a powerful automation framework that allows for the management of complex infrastructures on a large scale. It uses Ruby-based DSL (Domain Specific Language) for defining infrastructure as code, which makes it flexible and extensible. Chef is known for its strong community support, comprehensive documentation, and integration with major cloud providers. Its ability to automate the deployment and management of infrastructure ensures consistency, speed, and scalability across IT environments.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with large-scale, complex infrastructures that require automation at scale.
  • DevOps teams seeking to implement infrastructure as code for consistency and repeatability.
  • Enterprises looking to integrate configuration management across multiple cloud environments.
  • Development and operations teams that favor Ruby for scripting and customization.

Chef videos

+ Add

Chef - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Pro Chef Breaks Down Cooking Scenes from Movies | GQ
  • Review - Pro Chefs Review Restaurant Scenes In Movies | Test Kitchen Talks | Bon Appétit

Broadcom AutoSys videos

No Broadcom AutoSys videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Chef and Broadcom AutoSys)

Chef

Broadcom AutoSys

DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
IT Automation
83 83%
IT Automation
17% 17
Continuous Integration
100 100%
Continuous Integration
0% 0
Workflow Automation
0 0%
Workflow Automation
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Chef and Broadcom AutoSys. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Chef and Broadcom AutoSys

Chef Reviews

5 Best DevSecOps Tools in 2023
There are multiple providers for Infrastructure as Code such as AWS CloudFormation, RedHat Ansible, HashiCorp Terraform, Puppet, Chef, and others. It is advised to research each to determine what is best for any given situation since each has pros and cons. Some of these also are not completely free while others are. There are also some that are specific to a particular...
Source: devopsauthority.tech
Best 8 Ansible Alternatives & equivalent in 2022
Chef is a useful DevOps tool for achieving speed, scale, and consistency. It is a Cloud based system. It can be used to ease out complex tasks and perform automation.
Source: www.guru99.com
Top 5 Ansible Alternatives in 2022: Server Automation Solutions by Alexander Fashakin on the 19th Aug 2021 facebook Linked In Twitter
Chef makes it easier to manage and configure your servers. With Chef, you can integrate services such as Amazon’s EC2, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform to automatically provision and configure new machines. It enables all components of an IT infrastructure to be connected and facilitates adding new elements without manual intervention.
Source: www.servertribe.com
Ansible vs Chef: What’s the Difference?
So, which of these are better? In reality, it depends on what your organization needs. Chef has been around longer and is great for handling extremely complex tasks. Ansible is easier to install and use, and therefore is more limited in how difficult the tasks can be. It’s just a matter of understanding what’s important for your business, and that goes beyond a simply...
Source: www.simplilearn.com
Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible
Chef follows the cue of Puppet in this section of the Chef vs Puppet vs ansible debate. How? The master-slave architecture of Chef implies running the Chef server on the master machine and running the Chef clients as agents on different client machines. Apart from these similarities with Puppet, Chef also has an additional component in its architecture, the workstation. The...
Source: www.whizlabs.com

Broadcom AutoSys Reviews

The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Autosys allows users to define jobs, set up dependencies, and schedule them to run at specific times or in response to specific events. It also provides comprehensive job management, including reporting, monitoring, and alerting capabilities. The software can be integrated with various third-party applications and platforms, including databases, business intelligence tools,...
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Chef and Broadcom AutoSys, you can also consider the following products

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

Activeeon - ProActive Workflows & Scheduling is a java-based cross-platform workflow scheduler and resource manager that is able to run workflow tasks in multiple languages and multiple environments: Windows, Linux, Mac, Unix, etc.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

SysAid - SysAid is an AI-first Help Desk & ITSM platform powered by Agentic AI

Loading...