Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Checkmarx VS Underlayer

Compare Checkmarx VS Underlayer and see what are their differences

Checkmarx

The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Underlayer

Build courses by API, drop them into your product with one iframe, and get told who finished. No portal, no learner accounts, priced per course view.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $149 / Monthly
Alternatives Is it good?
SquadPrime
Free MVP cost calculator: describe your app in 5 clicks and get a realistic 2026 estimate for a freelancer build, a traditional agency and a fixed-price 14-day build by senior professionals, where the client owns the code. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Checkmarx seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.

social mentions
5 vs 0
Code Analysis popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
223 vs 2

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Checkmarx
Underlayer
Website checkmarx.com underlayerhq.com
Pricing —
Freemium $149 / Monthly Official pricing
Company — Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in
Code Review Developer Tools Web Application Security Code Analysis +1
Education E-learning Education / E-Learning

About Checkmarx and Underlayer

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Checkmarx
Underlayer

No description of Checkmarx yet.

Underlayer is headless, API-first training for SaaS products. Instead of sending your users to a separate LMS portal, you generate a course, embed it where they already work, and get every completion sent back to your own systems. How it works Create a course. Generate one from a doc or a prompt...

Read more about Underlayer

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Checkmarx 7 features
Underlayer 0 features
  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Checkmarx provides extensive support for multiple programming languages and frameworks, allowing for a broad range of applications to be scanned.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform integrates well with various DevOps tools and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to incorporate security checks into the software development lifecycle.
  • Customization
    Offers highly customizable rule sets that can be tailored to specific security requirements and coding standards of the organization.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface that allows users to efficiently manage and analyze security vulnerabilities.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale efficiently, Checkmarx can handle large codebases and multiple projects concurrently without significant performance degradation.
  • Strong Reporting Capabilities
    Provides detailed and actionable reports that help developers and security teams quickly understand and address vulnerabilities.
  • Automation
    Supports automated scanning, which helps reduce manual efforts and accelerates the vulnerability detection process.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Checkmarx can be expensive, especially for small to medium-sized organizations with limited budgets for security tools.
  • False Positives
    Although comprehensive, the platform sometimes generates false positives, which can lead to unnecessary work and distractions for development teams.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a steep learning curve due to the wide range of features and customization options available.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, scanning large and complex codebases can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, potentially impacting development timelines.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow to respond and may not always provide satisfactory solutions to issues.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup process can be complex and time-consuming, requiring considerable effort to properly configure all settings and integrations.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Checkmarx
Underlayer

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Checkmarx is generally regarded as a reliable and effective application security testing solution. Its robust features and proactive approach to identifying and mitigating security risks make it a valuable tool for organizations focused on maintaining a secure software development process.

Why this product is good

  • Checkmarx is considered a good choice for application security due to its comprehensive suite of tools designed to identify vulnerabilities early in the software development lifecycle. It offers features like Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST). The platform provides a high level of accuracy, integrates well with various development environments, and supports numerous programming languages. Additionally, Checkmarx is known for its ease of use and detailed reporting capabilities, which help developers quickly address security issues.

Recommended for

  • Companies looking for a comprehensive application security platform.
  • Development teams that need seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines.
  • Organizations that require support for multiple programming languages.
  • Security professionals who prioritize early vulnerability detection and detailed reporting.

No analysis of Underlayer yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Checkmarx 5 videos + Add
Underlayer 1 video + Add

Viewing results and understanding security issues via Checkmarx online scanner

More videos

  • - Checkmarx CxSAST Demonstration
  • - Meetups at Checkmarx: An Introduction to API Security
  • - Source code review with Checkmarx
  • - Checkmarx Results Review

Underlayer demo

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Checkmarx
Underlayer
100% 100%
Code Analysis
0% 0%
0% 0%
Education
100% 100%
100% 100%
Web Application Security
0% 0%
0% 0%
E-learning
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Checkmarx and Underlayer.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Underlayer's answer:

it's pre-launching

What makes your product unique?

Underlayer's answer:

Underlayer is training with no portal. You build a course by API, by MCP, or in the visual builder, and add it to your product with one iframe. Then signed webhooks tell your systems who finished. Learners never create an account or leave your app, and the player uses your theme, so it looks like part of your product. We charge per course view, not per seat, and every price and overage rate is published.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Underlayer's answer:

Most course tools, like Coassemble, Trainn and LearningStudioAI, assume training happens on their own site: learners sign up, log in and get enrolled, and you pay per seat. Underlayer takes the opposite approach:

No learner accounts. You pass in your own user IDs and we track progress against them. Built for developers. A full REST API covers every resource, and an MCP server lets AI agents create and edit courses. Results in your own tools. Signed webhooks send completions to your CRM, your product or your data warehouse. SCORM 1.2 and 2004 export for customers who still need to load courses into an LMS. Public pricing. Plans start at $149/month for 25,000 course views, with unlimited learners and no sales call required.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Underlayer's answer:

SaaS product, customer success and engineering teams who want onboarding, product education or compliance training inside their own app. It also suits platforms that train other people's users, like partner networks, marketplaces and field-ops tools, where a separate LMS login gets in the way.

What's the story behind your product?

Underlayer's answer:

Every company putting training in front of its users hit the same wall: the LMS wanted to own the learner. That meant a separate portal, a second login and a per-seat bill for people who never opened a course. We built Underlayer as the layer underneath instead. You keep the product and the user relationship. We handle building the course, playing it and tracking progress, and we stay out of the way.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Underlayer's answer:

Next.js 16 (App Router) with React 19 and TypeScript, Tailwind CSS v4, and Supabase (Postgres with row-level security, Auth and Storage). Claude from Anthropic generates courses with AI. Stripe handles billing and Resend sends email. There is also a remote MCP server with OAuth 2.1 for AI-agent access.

User comments

Share your experience with using Checkmarx and Underlayer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Checkmarx no reviews yet
Underlayer no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Underlayer yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Checkmarx 5 mentions
Underlayer 0 mentions

View more

Tracking Underlayer since Sep 2026.

Alternatives to Checkmarx and Underlayer

When comparing Checkmarx and Underlayer, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...