Checkmarx VS lsof

Compare Checkmarx VS lsof and see what are their differences

Rating: 0 reviews

Rating: 0 reviews

Hyperview

DCIM software reinvented. sponsored

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Checkmarx seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.

social mentions: 4 vs 0
Code Analysis popularity: 100% vs 0%
alternatives listed: 240+ vs 22

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

	Checkmarx	l lsof
Website	checkmarx.com	people.freebsd.org
Listed in	Code Review Developer Tools Web Application Security Code Analysis +1	Monitoring Tools Command Line Tools Performance Monitoring Accounting +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Checkmarx 7 features

lsof 0 features

Comprehensive Coverage
Checkmarx provides extensive support for multiple programming languages and frameworks, allowing for a broad range of applications to be scanned.
Integration Capabilities
The platform integrates well with various DevOps tools and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to incorporate security checks into the software development lifecycle.
Customization
Offers highly customizable rule sets that can be tailored to specific security requirements and coding standards of the organization.
User-Friendly Interface
Features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface that allows users to efficiently manage and analyze security vulnerabilities.
Scalability
Designed to scale efficiently, Checkmarx can handle large codebases and multiple projects concurrently without significant performance degradation.
Strong Reporting Capabilities
Provides detailed and actionable reports that help developers and security teams quickly understand and address vulnerabilities.
Automation
Supports automated scanning, which helps reduce manual efforts and accelerates the vulnerability detection process.

Possible disadvantages

Cost
Checkmarx can be expensive, especially for small to medium-sized organizations with limited budgets for security tools.
False Positives
Although comprehensive, the platform sometimes generates false positives, which can lead to unnecessary work and distractions for development teams.
Learning Curve
New users may face a steep learning curve due to the wide range of features and customization options available.
Performance Overhead
In some cases, scanning large and complex codebases can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, potentially impacting development timelines.
Customer Support
Some users have reported that customer support can be slow to respond and may not always provide satisfactory solutions to issues.
Initial Setup
The initial setup process can be complex and time-consuming, requiring considerable effort to properly configure all settings and integrations.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Checkmarx

lsof

Overall verdict

Yes, Checkmarx is generally regarded as a reliable and effective application security testing solution. Its robust features and proactive approach to identifying and mitigating security risks make it a valuable tool for organizations focused on maintaining a secure software development process.

Why this product is good

Checkmarx is considered a good choice for application security due to its comprehensive suite of tools designed to identify vulnerabilities early in the software development lifecycle. It offers features like Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST). The platform provides a high level of accuracy, integrates well with various development environments, and supports numerous programming languages. Additionally, Checkmarx is known for its ease of use and detailed reporting capabilities, which help developers quickly address security issues.

Recommended for

Companies looking for a comprehensive application security platform.
Development teams that need seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines.
Organizations that require support for multiple programming languages.
Security professionals who prioritize early vulnerability detection and detailed reporting.

Overall verdict

lsof (List Open Files) is a mature, battle-tested Unix/Linux utility that reliably reveals which files, sockets, and resources are opened by processes, making it an indispensable diagnostic tool for system administrators and developers.

Why this product is good

Provides comprehensive visibility into open files, network sockets, pipes, and devices tied to running processes
Extremely useful for troubleshooting 'device busy' errors, port conflicts, and locating processes holding onto deleted files
Highly portable across many Unix-like systems including FreeBSD, Linux, macOS, and Solaris
Long history of stable, well-maintained releases with extensive documentation and community support
Powerful filtering options let you query by user, process, port, file, or network connection

Recommended for

System administrators diagnosing resource and file-locking issues
Developers debugging network connections and socket usage
Security professionals investigating suspicious process activity and open network ports
Anyone needing to identify which process is using a specific file, directory, or port before unmounting or killing

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Checkmarx 5 videos + Add

lsof 2 videos + Add

Viewing results and understanding security issues via Checkmarx online scanner

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100

Checkmarx

lsof

100% 100%

Code Analysis

0% 0%

Monitoring Tools

100% 100%

Web Application Security

0% 0%

Command Line Tools

100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Checkmarx and lsof. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Checkmarx no reviews yet

lsof no reviews yet

The Top 11 Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools
expertinsights.com · Mar 2025

Why We Picked Checkmarx SAST: We like Checkmarx SAST for its early detection of vulnerabilities, which enables faster and safer code development. Its AI-assisted prioritization of vulnerabilities according to severity...
Top 11 SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
www.codeant.ai · Oct 2024

Checkmarx is a developer-centric security tool that specializes in secure coding practices and compliance. It helps developers identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their code, ensuring that their applications...
The 5 Best SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
blog.codacy.com · May 2024

While SonarQube offers some security features, Checkmarx provides a more holistic approach to application security, covering a more comprehensive range of security aspects throughout the SDLC. Checkmarx One's...

We have no reviews of lsof yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Checkmarx 4 mentions

lsof 0 mentions

Troubleshooting Broken Function Level Authorization
Tools like OWASP ZAP are excellent for dynamic application security testing, while SonarQube and Checkmarx specialize in static security testing. These tools integrate seamlessly into your pipeline, automating checks and enabling you to... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Penetration Testing for API Security: Protecting Digital Gateways
Tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx, or Snyk can automate parts of this process by scanning for known vulnerability patterns. While white box testing may not reflect real-world attack scenarios (as attackers rarely access source code), it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
A Guide to DevSecOps with API Gateway
Automate security testing: Use tools such as OWASP ZAP, SonarQube, or Checkmarx to automate security testing. This will help you identify security issues early in the development process and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities being... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Tracking lsof since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Checkmarx and lsof

When comparing Checkmarx and lsof, you can also consider the following products.

Veracode
Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.

Compare Veracode to Checkmarx or lsof:

Veracode vs Checkmarx Veracode vs lsof
htop
htop - an interactive process viewer for Unix. This is htop, an interactive process viewer for Unix systems. It is a text-mode application (for console or X terminals) and requires ncurses. Latest release: htop 2.

Compare htop to Checkmarx or lsof:

htop vs Checkmarx htop vs lsof
Coverity Scan
Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Compare Coverity Scan to Checkmarx or lsof:

Coverity Scan vs Checkmarx Coverity Scan vs lsof
Sysdig
Sysdig is an open source, system-level exploration that capture system state and activity from a running Linux instance, then save, filter and analyze.

Compare Sysdig to Checkmarx or lsof:

Sysdig vs Checkmarx Sysdig vs lsof
SonarQube
SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Compare SonarQube to Checkmarx or lsof:

SonarQube vs Checkmarx SonarQube vs lsof
v

vtop
vtop is a graphical command-line tool that uses unicode braille to chart CPU and memory usage.

Compare vtop to Checkmarx or lsof:

vtop vs Checkmarx vtop vs lsof