Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Charles Proxy VS GitHub Copilot

Compare Charles Proxy VS GitHub Copilot and see what are their differences

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

GitHub Copilot logo GitHub Copilot

Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • GitHub Copilot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Trained on billions of lines of public code, GitHub Copilot puts the knowledge you need at your fingertips, saving you time and helping you stay focused.

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

GitHub Copilot features and specs

  • Productivity Boost
    GitHub Copilot helps developers write code faster by providing intelligent suggestions and automating repetitive tasks. This can save significant time and reduce the cognitive load on developers.
  • Learning Tool
    For less experienced developers, Copilot can serve as a learning tool by suggesting best practices and introducing them to new coding patterns and techniques.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Copilot supports a wide range of programming languages, making it a versatile tool for developers working in different tech stacks.
  • Context-Aware Suggestions
    Copilot offers context-aware suggestions based on the code that has been written so far, making its recommendations relevant to the current development task.
  • Integration with GitHub
    Seamless integration with GitHub simplifies the development workflow, enabling smoother transitions from coding to version control and collaboration.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Copilot

  • Code Quality Concerns
    The quality of the code generated by Copilot may vary, and it might introduce suboptimal code or practices that could lead to maintenance challenges.
  • Security Risks
    Copilot might suggest insecure code patterns or snippets, potentially introducing vulnerabilities into the project if not carefully reviewed by the developer.
  • Dependence on AI
    Over-reliance on Copilot's suggestions can lead to a lack of deep understanding of the code, which may hinder a developer's growth and problem-solving skills.
  • Licensing and Code Reuse Issues
    There are concerns about the legality and ethics of using AI-generated code snippets that might be derived from copyrighted sources, which can lead to licensing issues.
  • Limited Customizability
    Copilot may not always align with specific coding standards or preferences of a development team, and the ability to customize its behavior to enforce such standards is limited.

Analysis of Charles Proxy

Overall verdict

  • Charles Proxy is considered an excellent tool for those who need to monitor and analyze network communications. Its rich set of features and ease of use make it a valuable asset for developers and testers.

Why this product is good

  • Charles Proxy is widely regarded as a robust and versatile tool for web developers, offering comprehensive features for HTTP/HTTPS debugging, web traffic analysis, and SSL proxying. It provides a user-friendly interface, supports a wide array of platforms, and is especially useful for troubleshooting network issues and optimizing network calls.

Recommended for

  • Web Developers
  • Mobile App Developers
  • Network Engineers
  • QA Testers
  • Technical Support Teams

Analysis of GitHub Copilot

Overall verdict

  • Overall, GitHub Copilot is a beneficial tool for many developers, especially those looking to increase their productivity and experiment with new coding styles. It can be seen as an intelligent coding assistant that complements a developer's workflow rather than replaces it.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub Copilot is considered good by many because it provides AI-assisted code completion and suggestions, which can significantly speed up coding tasks and improve productivity. It leverages OpenAI's advanced language models to offer context-aware snippets and solutions that can help developers write code more efficiently, reduce errors, and explore new coding approaches.

Recommended for

  • Software developers seeking to increase productivity
  • Beginner programmers looking for contextual code suggestions
  • Experienced developers interested in exploring and discovering alternative coding solutions
  • Teams aiming to standardize code quality and reduce time spent on routine coding tasks

Charles Proxy videos

No Charles Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

GitHub Copilot videos

Game over… GitHub Copilot X announced

More videos:

  • Review - The New GitHub Copilot X Powered by GPT-4 is Here!
  • Review - GitHub Copilot X -- AI Programming Gets Better... and Scary.
  • Review - GitHub Copilot Review 2023: I Love It, But It's Not For Everyone
  • Review - Is Github Copilot Worth Paying For??

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Charles Proxy and GitHub Copilot)
Developer Tools
16 16%
84% 84
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
AI
0 0%
100% 100
Security
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Charles Proxy and GitHub Copilot. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Charles Proxy and GitHub Copilot

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

GitHub Copilot Reviews

  1. Stan
    · Founder at SaaSHub ·
    Indispensable

    It definitely increases my productivity.

    🏁 Competitors: Tabnine

Cursor vs Windsurf vs GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot Chat is similar — you can ask it to explain code or suggest improvements. It's integrated right into VS Code, so it feels pretty seamless. They've been rolling out some new features lately, like better chat history, drag and & folders and ways to attach more context. But if you're already using Cursor, you might not find anything groundbreaking here.
Source: www.builder.io
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot Chat is similar — you can ask it to explain code or suggest improvements. It's integrated right into VS Code, so it feels pretty seamless. They've been rolling out some new features lately, like better chat history, drag and & folders and ways to attach more context. But if you're already using Cursor, you might not find anything groundbreaking here.
Source: www.builder.io
Top 10 Vercel v0 Open Source Alternatives | Medium
Next up, we have GitHub Copilot, a popular AI-powered code completion tool that’s been making waves in the developer community. Built on top of OpenAI Codex, Copilot integrates seamlessly with various code editors and IDEs to provide intelligent code suggestions as you type.
Source: medium.com
10 Best Github Copilot Alternatives in 2024
GitHub Copilot is an excellent tool for developers, allowing them to boost their workflow and project quality. Are you looking for a GitHub Copilot alternative that fits your needs in 2024? Whether you’re searching for a free GitHub Copilot alternative, an open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot, or a tool that works well with VSCode, this guide is here to help.
The Best GitHub Copilot Alternatives for Developers
Moreover, GitHub Copilot provides a wide range of functionalities, such as code explanation, answering coding questions, refactoring code, and generation of unit tests and docs. With it, developers can automate coding tasks, improve productivity and focus more on complex coding. GitHub Copilot supports various programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Ruby, Go,...
Source: softteco.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Copilot seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 297 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Charles Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Charles Proxy yet. Tracking of Charles Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GitHub Copilot mentions (297)

  • My Experience at Commit Conf 2025
    AI is replacing traditional platforms like Stack Overflow, Reddit, and Google Search for developers — tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor.ai, and Windsurf are seen as faster, more tailored, and more efficient. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • Getting the Best Out of GitHub Copilot
    As my first in-editor AI coding partner, I started with Cursor. However, four months ago, I decided to switch to GitHub Copilot. While using Cursor, I was aware of Copilot and its features, but at the time, it felt unstable and not as polished as Cursor. Recently, I noticed that GitHub Copilot has been improving significantly, becoming a strong competitor to Cursor. This encouraged me to give Copilot a try,... - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
  • I've tried all (46 😵‍💫) AI Coding Agents & IDEs
    GitHub Copilot The OG of this game, started back in 2020. Can generate code. Handles large codebases. Can merge PRs, fix bugs, search code. Supports agent mode now and also it's open-sourced. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • GitHub Copilot: AI-Powered Development with Intelligent Code Assistance
    GitHub Copilot transforms the developer experience with AI-powered code completions, chat assistance, and intelligent code reviews. Backed by advanced AI models including Claude, GPT, and Gemini, Copilot provides contextualized assistance throughout the software development lifecycle. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Semantic Code Search
    We at Ducky.ai noticed a strange thing has happened in software development, we’re no longer writing code in the traditional sense. Instead, we describe what we want and ask the machine to write the first draft. Tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Replit, and Devin have changed what it means to build. The keyboard isn’t gone, but it’s quieter. Developers are prompting, guiding, reviewing. Code appears in response... - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Charles Proxy and GitHub Copilot, you can also consider the following products

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Codeium - Free AI-powered code completion for *everyone*, *everywhere*

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Tabnine - TabNine is the all-language autocompleter. We use deep learning to help you write code faster.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.