Software Alternatives & Startups

Centurion Setup VS Makeself

Compare Centurion Setup VS Makeself and see what are their differences

Centurion Setup

Builds a professional software installer for Windows in a self-contained, compressed executable.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $130 / One-off (5 activations)
Makeself

makeself.sh is a small shell script that generates a self-extractable tar.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Package Builder popularity
29% vs 71%
alternatives listed
27 vs 44

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Centurion Setup
Makeself
Website gammadyne.com megastep.org
Pricing
Paid Free trial $130 / One-off (5 activations) Official pricing
Platforms
Windows
Company 2020
Listed in

About Centurion Setup and Makeself

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Centurion Setup
Makeself

After putting a lot of effort into your software, it's time to distribute it. Don't spend weeks wrestling with a complicated installation builder when you are so close to being done. Centurion Setup is extremely easy to use, and you can have a professional installation program built in minutes....

Read more about Centurion Setup

No description of Makeself yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Centurion Setup 9 features
Makeself 5 features
  • Builds self contained executable
  • Multiple languages
  • Royalty free
  • Installs MSI packages, drivers, COM/TLB
  • Installs registry keys
  • Installs firewall exceptions
  • Digital signature
  • Creates restore point
  • Creates desktop/Start Menu shortcuts
  • Portability
    Makeself generates self-extracting archives that are shell script-based, ensuring compatibility across different Linux and UNIX systems without requiring additional software.
  • Ease of Use
    Creating self-extracting archives is straightforward, using simple command-line instructions to bundle files into a single executable.
  • Customization
    Allows scripts to be executed before or after extraction, providing flexibility to define custom installation or setup processes.
  • Compression Support
    Supports various compression methods (gzip, bzip2, xz) to reduce the size of the archive, optimizing storage and transfer.
  • No Dependencies
    Does not introduce runtime dependencies, as it relies on standard shell scripting and common Unix tools available on most systems.

Possible disadvantages

  • Security Risks
    Self-extracting archives can potentially execute harmful scripts if tampered with, posing a security risk if distributed unchecked.
  • Limited to Command Line
    Operates entirely through the command line, which might be less accessible to users who prefer GUI-based tools for creating archives.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Lacks some advanced features found in other packaging tools, such as dependency resolution, automatic updates, or integrated uninstall options.
  • Platform Limits
    Primarily designed for UNIX-like systems, which means native Windows support is not available without additional compatibility layers.
  • Not Ideal for Large Software
    Might not be suitable for packaging complex applications that require detailed installation processes or dependency management.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Centurion Setup
Makeself
29% 29%
71% 71%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Centurion Setup and Makeself. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Centurion Setup and Makeself

When comparing Centurion Setup and Makeself, you can also consider the following products.