Software Alternatives & Startups

Celery Project VS Android Things Lantern

Compare Celery Project VS Android Things Lantern and see what are their differences

Celery Project

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Android Things Lantern

Real-world AR with Google's new IoT platform

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Celery Project seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.

social mentions
5 vs 0
Customer Feedback popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
17 vs 15

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Celery Project
Android Things Lantern
Website celeryproject.org experiments.withgoogle.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Celery Project 5 features
Android Things Lantern 4 features
  • Asynchronous Task Management
    Celery excels in managing asynchronous tasks and distributing them across multiple worker nodes, allowing for efficient task execution parallelism.
  • Supports Multiple Brokers
    Celery supports multiple message brokers like RabbitMQ, Redis, and Amazon SQS, offering flexibility to choose the best solution suited for your architecture.
  • Extensive Community and Documentation
    Being a mature project, Celery has extensive documentation and a large, active community, which helps in debugging, obtaining advice, and accessing numerous third-party extensions.
  • Periodic Task Scheduling
    Celery provides built-in periodic task scheduling similar to cron jobs, achieved via Celery Beat, enabling tasks to be executed at regular intervals.
  • High Scalability
    Celery is designed to scale horizontally, allowing you to increase throughput by adding more worker nodes to handle an increased load.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity in Setup and Configuration
    Setting up Celery can be complex, particularly for beginners, due to the need to configure workers, brokers, and understanding numerous configuration options.
  • Resource Intensive
    Celery can be resource-intensive, particularly if a large number of workers are used, requiring careful management of system resources and broker settings.
  • Limited Monitoring Tools
    Although there are tools and extensions available, Celery's builtin monitoring solutions may not meet all the needs for extensive task monitoring, requiring third-party integrations.
  • Database Task Backend Limitations
    Using a database as a result backend can lead to performance issues and limitations on result storage for large-scale applications, making other backend solutions, like Redis, more favorable.
  • Concurrency Management Complexity
    Managing concurrency in Celery can be intricate, requiring a deep understanding of how task distribution, workers, and broker configurations interact.
  • Ease of Use
    Android Things Lantern is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, making it accessible for both developers and hobbyists.
  • Customizability
    Users can create custom applications and modify the functionality of Lantern to suit specific needs, making it a versatile tool.
  • Integration with IoT
    Lantern seamlessly integrates with Internet of Things (IoT) devices, providing a platform to develop and test IoT solutions.
  • Educational Value
    The device serves as a valuable educational tool, helping users learn about Android development and IoT technologies.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Hardware Support
    As a niche product, Lantern may not support a wide range of hardware components, limiting its capabilities.
  • Discontinued Software Updates
    Android Things has been discontinued by Google, meaning Lantern may not receive future software updates or support.
  • Market Adoption
    It struggled to gain widespread adoption, which might result in a smaller community and limited third-party resources.
  • Cost
    Building or purchasing the parts for Lantern might be expensive compared to other microcontroller-based platforms or DIY options.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Celery Project
Android Things Lantern
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Celery Project and Android Things Lantern. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Celery Project 5 mentions
Android Things Lantern 0 mentions
  • Test if a celery task is still being processed
    How can I test if a task (task_id) is still processed in celery? I have the following scenario:. Source: over 4 years ago
  • how to serialize binary files to use with a celery task
    I recently integrated celery (django-celery to be more specific) in one of my applications. I have a model in the application as follows. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Django - post_init signal is called on Model instance save & before instance is even created. Why?
    I am trying to write a small application that receives video files, and convert them to a uniform format after they have been uploaded (thus added to the database). I have searched the web for the best solution for this, and have decided... Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Android Things Lantern since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Celery Project and Android Things Lantern

When comparing Celery Project and Android Things Lantern, you can also consider the following products.