Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cattr VS Codeship

Compare Cattr VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Roadmark
A visual roadmap you branch rather than overwrite: both timelines stay, each with its own decision. Syncs from Linear, Jira, GitHub, and more, so a shared link stays true. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Cattr logo Cattr

Cattr is a free open-source self-hosted time tracker with desktop clients for windows, mac, linux.

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • Cattr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-08
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Cattr features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all technical skills.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, it allows for customization and community-driven improvements, enhancing its functionality and adaptability.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Cattr is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing flexibility in terms of usage.
  • Time Tracking
    It provides robust time tracking capabilities that help in managing productivity and monitoring team performance.
  • Offline Mode
    The application supports offline mode, enabling time tracking even without an Internet connection.

Possible disadvantages of Cattr

  • Limited Integrations
    Compared to other time-tracking tools, Cattr currently offers fewer integrations with third-party applications.
  • Mobile App Absence
    As of now, Cattr lacks a dedicated mobile application, which could be a limitation for teams that need to track work on the go.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are user-friendly, more advanced functionalities may require a steeper learning curve and some technical expertise.
  • Frequent Updates
    The software undergoes frequent updates, which may sometimes lead to temporary instability or new bugs.
  • Community-driven Support
    Support is primarily community-driven, which might not be as prompt or comprehensive as the dedicated customer support offered by commercial tools.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Analysis of Cattr

Overall verdict

  • Cattr is generally considered a good option for both freelancers and managers who require an open-source, customizable, and cost-effective time tracking solution with robust reporting capabilities.

Why this product is good

  • Cattr (cattr.app) is a time tracking and productivity tool designed to help individuals and teams manage their workflows more efficiently. It offers features such as activity logging, app usage tracking, and detailed reporting. This makes it a valuable tool for businesses looking to optimize productivity and ensure accountability.

Recommended for

  • Remote teams looking for a time tracking solution to monitor productivity.
  • Freelancers who need to manage their time effectively across multiple projects.
  • Organizations that prefer open-source software with customizable features.
  • Managers seeking detailed reporting and analytics on team performance.

Cattr videos

No Cattr videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codeship videos

+ Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship --ย Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cattr and Codeship)

Cattr

Codeship

Time Tracking
100 100%
Time Tracking
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Invoicing
100 100%
Invoicing
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cattr and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cattr and Codeship

Cattr Reviews

We have no reviews of Cattr yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. Itโ€™s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity thatโ€™s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
Source: solutionsuggest.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cattr seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cattr mentions (2)

  • Work Log App ?
    Cattr is a self-hosted time tracker. Helpful if you find yourself on multiple devices, even if you are the only one using it. Source: over 3 years ago
  • What are your suggestions for a setup of a perfect server, software side of things?
    Cattr, Youtrack, Activity watch - this is my search for an application to manage my projects and track the time spent on them. The closest thing to the ideal is the online service Trackabi. Youtrack is too fancy, more like Jira. Cattr does not know how to track active applications and project management is very simple. Activity watch is good at keeping track of active windows, but it needs a bundle with... Source: about 5 years ago

Codeship mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Codeship yet. Tracking of Codeship recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cattr and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

Toggl - Toggl is an online time tracking tool. It features 1-click time tracking and helps you see where your time goes. Free and paid versions are available.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Clockify - Simple and free time tracker. Perfect for small and mid-sized businesses as well as freelancers. Unlimited projects and users, unlimited productivity. Get all the premium functionalities, completely free.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

ManicTime - Track your computer usage and use collected data to accurately tag time.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CIโ€™s precision syntaxโ€”all with the developer in mind.

Loading...