
Safety Wing
Loom
Ditto Insurance
Cherry
FlexGet
Grapevine Surveys
Medusa TV Library Manager
Catch is the easiest way to use ShowRSS on OS X. It'll take care of everything.

NinjaOne
PDQ Deploy
Tactical RMM
Action1 Endpoint Security Platform
Automox
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Microsoft Intune
Deploy, patch, monitor, alert, auto-remediate, and remote-control thousands of Windows endpoints from a browser tab. A full Windows RMM. Agent or agentless, outbound 443 only. Free for 100 endpoints.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | kaylees.site | getrff.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Catch yet.
RFF is a full Windows RMM that runs in a browser tab. Deploy MSI, EXE or PowerShell to thousands of endpoints, patch them on a schedule with staged Patch Tuesday rings, monitor them with checks that can self-heal, and take control of any session with browser-based remote desktop. Agents talk...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of RFF yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
IS CATCH COM AU A SCAM? DECORATING MY RUNDOWN RENTAL PART 2
More videos
No RFF videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Catch and RFF.
RFF's answer:
RFF is Windows-only on purpose, and it goes deep on the surfaces other RMMs skip. Group Policy is captured as a readable, versioned baseline you can diff for drift, down to which GPO set each value. It pushes software to machines that have no agent installed at all, over SMB and WMI. It installs apps that refuse SYSTEM context into the signed-in user's real session, the classic SCCM blind spot. It takes a wiped machine to named, enrolled and domain-joined off one USB stick, pulling Windows straight from Microsoft so there is no golden image to maintain. And every operational feature is on every plan, including the free one: you pay for the number of machines, not for capabilities.
RFF's answer:
Three concrete reasons. Pricing is published and self-serve: free for 100 endpoints forever, then $149/mo including 100 and $2.00/endpoint above that with no cap, no per-technician seats and no sales call. Gating is by scale, not capability, so a 40-machine shop gets vulnerability scanning, conformance baselines, BitLocker recovery-key escrow and remote desktop on the same terms a 2,000-machine one does. And support is the founder's inbox, usually answered in hours, by someone who ran Windows endpoint management for a hospital fleet of tens of thousands of devices on SCCM, Tanium, Intune and PDQ. RFF is also honest about the trade: Windows only, no PSA or ticketing, no network monitoring. If those are must-haves, something else fits better, and our comparison pages say so.
RFF's answer:
Windows-first internal IT teams running roughly 100 to 2,000 endpoints, plus small and mid-size MSPs managing several client fleets. Usually a one-to-five person team that has outgrown scripts and ad-hoc tools, finds SCCM too heavy to keep alive, and has hit the gaps in Intune for anything that is not a modern-managed laptop. Regulated shops in healthcare, finance and legal come for the compliance export, BitLocker escrow and audit trail. Not a fit for macOS, Linux or mobile fleets.
RFF's answer:
RFF is built by Brian Vitko, who spent years running Windows endpoint management for a hospital: tens of thousands of devices across SCCM, Tanium, Intune and PDQ. The pattern never changed. The expensive tools could not do the ordinary thing, like install an app into a user's session, tell you which GPO actually set a value, or patch the laptop that was asleep at deploy time. The affordable tools stopped wherever the vendor decided "small business" ended. RFF is the tool that would have saved that team its worst weeks: every feature on every plan, priced by machine count, and honest about what it does not do. It is built and supported by one person, which is why the founder's inbox is the support channel.
RFF's answer:
.NET 8 and ASP.NET Core (C#) for the API, PostgreSQL with EF Core for storage, with tenant isolation enforced at the database layer via row-level security. SignalR over WebSockets carries live job events and remote desktop. Redis handles rate limiting. The console is React 18 with TypeScript, Vite, Tailwind CSS, TanStack Query and Zustand. The Windows agent is C#, runs as a service, and talks outbound HTTPS on 443 only. Hosted on Render, with Cloudflare for DNS and R2 for package artifacts, Stripe for billing and Sentry for error tracking.
Share your experience with using Catch and RFF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing Catch and RFF, you can also consider the following products.


NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools.
Compare NinjaOne to Catch or RFF:

Loom is a screen recording extension for Chrome that gives people the ability to create and share media. Create your own videos using your camera, screen view, and audio. Read more about Loom.
Compare Loom to Catch or RFF:

Deploy software quickly with PDQ Deploy. It's simple to install just about anything to multiple computers on your network.
Compare PDQ Deploy to Catch or RFF:

Ditto Insurance is a new-age insurance platform built for Millenials, where we simplify insurance & help people purchase the best plans in the market.
Compare Ditto Insurance to Catch or RFF:

Tactical RMM is a remote monitoring & management tool for Windows computers, built with Django, Vue and Golang. It uses an agent written in Golang and integrates with MeshCentral
Compare Tactical RMM to Catch or RFF: