Software Alternatives & Startups

Cartes VS CloudLinux

Compare Cartes VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

Cartes

A free and open map, Web alternative to Google and Apple maps, to find a business, a place, visit a city, calculate a route on foot, by bike, by public transport, or by train.

Rating
0 reviews
CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Cartes seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 18 times since March 2021.

social mentions
18 vs 0
Maps popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Cartes
CloudLinux
Website cartes.app cloudlinux.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Cartes 5 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • Beautiful UI Design
    Cartes offers a visually appealing and modern user interface for exploring maps and geographic data, making it pleasant and intuitive to use compared to many traditional mapping tools.
  • Open Source
    Cartes is an open-source project, allowing developers to inspect the code, contribute improvements, and adapt it for their own purposes, fostering transparency and community collaboration.
  • French Transit and Mobility Focus
    The app provides strong coverage of French transportation options including cycling, walking, and public transit, making it a useful tool for planning multimodal journeys in France.
  • Privacy-Friendly
    As an alternative to major commercial mapping services like Google Maps, Cartes takes a more privacy-conscious approach, reducing user tracking and data collection compared to big tech alternatives.
  • OpenStreetMap Integration
    Cartes leverages OpenStreetMap data, benefiting from the extensive community-maintained geographic database while providing a more user-friendly interface on top of it.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Global Coverage
    Cartes is primarily focused on France, so its features, transit data, and detailed information may be significantly less comprehensive or useful for users in other countries or regions.
  • Smaller Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to established mapping platforms like Google Maps or Apple Maps, Cartes has a much smaller user base and developer community, which can mean fewer integrations, plugins, and third-party support.
  • Feature Gaps Compared to Major Platforms
    Cartes may lack some advanced features that users expect from mature mapping platforms, such as Street View, detailed business information, real-time traffic updates, or comprehensive reviews and ratings.
  • Potential Data Accuracy Issues
    Since it relies on OpenStreetMap data, some locations may have outdated or incomplete information, particularly in less actively maintained areas, leading to occasional inaccuracies.
  • Still in Active Development
    As a relatively newer project, Cartes may have bugs, missing features, or stability issues that more established mapping services have already resolved, which could affect the user experience.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Cartes
CloudLinux

Overall verdict

  • Cartes (cartes.app) is a solid, user-friendly tool for creating and managing visual content, maps, or interactive presentations, offering a good balance of ease of use and flexibility for its target audience.

Why this product is good

  • Intuitive interface that makes it accessible to both beginners and experienced users
  • Flexible tools for building interactive and visually appealing content
  • Cloud-based access allowing you to work from anywhere and collaborate easily
  • Regular updates and improvements based on user feedback
  • Time-saving templates and features that streamline the creation process

Recommended for

  • Content creators looking to build interactive visual presentations
  • Small businesses and startups needing an easy-to-use design tool
  • Educators and students creating engaging learning materials
  • Teams that need cloud-based collaboration on visual projects
  • Marketers and designers seeking a flexible, accessible platform

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Cartes 1 video + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

🌞« Cartes des archétypes de Caroline Myss » review

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Cartes
CloudLinux
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Cartes and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Cartes 18 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • One of the Greatest Inventions in the History of Human Transport
    Well he'd be proud to see the extend of the fixed routes network in France today : https://cartes.app/?style=transports#6.32/47.811/2.097 Each blue polygon is a network. Zoom to see the lines. Of course we should do way better, and unify... - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago
  • StreetComplete on iOS is now in public beta
    Https://cartes.app is trying to do this. OsmAnd is quite usable as well. For navigation there's Magic Earth (can route around traffic jams), TomTom, and Scenic. OsmAnd can also do routing. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • StreetComplete on iOS is now in public beta
    For the web, I personally like https://osmapps.org https://cartes.app I can also recommend. Both projects have a similar goal, to offer a more useful UI around using an OSM based map. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

View more

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Cartes and CloudLinux

When comparing Cartes and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.