Software Alternatives & Reviews

Capybara VS gatling.io

Compare Capybara VS gatling.io and see what are their differences

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.

gatling.io logo gatling.io

Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05
  • gatling.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

gatling.io videos

Gatling Introduction

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Capybara and gatling.io)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
21 21%
79% 79
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Capybara and gatling.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, gatling.io should be more popular than Capybara. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Capybara mentions (11)

  • 16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
    Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Using Capybara to test responsive code
    Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Minitest vs. RSpec in Rails
    Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • From partials to ViewComponents: writing reusable front-end code in Rails
    The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Tip: if you're changing all your form_for to form_with, take the opportunity to make sure all forms are being tested.
    To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

gatling.io mentions (19)

  • What is Load Testing? Complete Tutorial With Best Practices
    Gatling: An open-source load and performance testing tool primarily designed for web applications, Gatling utilizes a simple domain-specific language (DSL) for creating and maintaining test scripts. It supports HTTP/2 and allows recording and generation of scenarios directly from a browser. The tool also provides detailed performance reports that are easy to analyze. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Best Practices in Testing GraphQL APIs
    Performance and load testing are essential parts of GraphQL API testing. It ensures APIs can handle expected traffic volumes and respond within acceptable timeframes. You can use tools like Apache JMeter or Gatling to generate realistic loads and evaluate the API's performance under different scenarios. Techniques like batched queries and caching can help mitigate this issue. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Perf/web testing framework similar to locust/gatling for .NET?
    New to the .NET community and trying to learn! I have used tools such as Apache JMeter (Java), gatling.io (Java) and Locust (Python) that are decent full featured web perf frameworks. Typically these integrate well with your code, and can be run as part of your unit/integration tests and produce offline reports. Source: about 1 year ago
  • How can I do a simple load test for an API I'm developing?
    Gatling , this is what we tested concurrency with. Setting up might take a while depending on your exp. But the tool is solid. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Optimizing Decision Making with a Trie Tree-Based Rules Engine: An Experience Report
    I used SpringBoot 3.0.2, GraalVM 22 (JVM mode), a MacOS 2,6 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i7, running 1000 users for 5 minutes. The idea was to test how memory consumption and CPU usage evolve. Below, I compared the footprint of these three solutions. I collected the total count of requests, throughput, memory consumption, and CPU usage using VisualVM and Gatling. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Capybara and gatling.io, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

locust - An open source load testing tool written in Python.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service