Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

gatling.io VS Apache JMeter

Compare gatling.io VS Apache JMeter and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

gatling.io logo gatling.io

Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty

Apache JMeter logo Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter™.
  • gatling.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • Apache JMeter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

gatling.io features and specs

  • High Performance
    Gatling is designed to handle a large number of concurrent users, making it suitable for stress testing and performance testing high-load applications.
  • Scalability
    It supports distributed testing, allowing you to scale your tests across multiple machines to simulate more users.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Gatling provides comprehensive reports with graphical visualizations, making it easy to analyze the results and pinpoint performance bottlenecks.
  • Scriptable Tests
    It uses a domain-specific language (DSL) in Scala for test scripts, offering powerful features for customizing test scenarios.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Gatling can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines, making it beneficial for continuous testing in development workflows.
  • Open-Source
    The tool offers an open-source version, allowing for cost-effective testing solutions and community-driven support and enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of gatling.io

  • Learning Curve
    The use of Scala in writing scripts may pose a steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with this programming language.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Gatling primarily focuses on HTTP protocols, which may limit its use for applications that require broad protocol support.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running high-load tests can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable hardware infrastructure for accurate simulations.
  • Complex Setup
    Setting up distributed testing or integrating with other systems may require additional configuration and technical expertise, adding to the initial setup complexity.
  • Paid Enterprise Version
    Advanced features and support are available in the enterprise version, which may incur additional costs compared to the open-source offering.

Apache JMeter features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache JMeter is free to use, reducing the overall cost of testing and allowing for significant customization by the community.
  • Extensibility
    JMeter is highly extensible with plugins, which can add additional functionalities and capabilities tailored to specific needs.
  • Strong Community Support
    Due to its long history and widespread usage, JMeter benefits from a large, active community that provides tutorials, plugins, and troubleshooting help.
  • Supports Various Protocols
    JMeter supports a wide range of testing protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, LDAP, JDBC, and JMS, making it versatile for different types of applications.
  • Continuous Integration
    JMeter can be easily integrated with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, enabling automated performance testing in the development pipeline.
  • Graphical Interface
    The graphical user interface (GUI) makes it easier for testers to design and configure testing scenarios without extensive programming knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Apache JMeter

  • Resource Intensive
    JMeter can be resource-intensive, especially when simulating high loads, which may require substantial hardware to mimic real-world scenarios.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Despite its GUI, JMeter can be complex to learn and use effectively, especially for those who are new to performance testing.
  • Limited Reporting
    JMeter's built-in reporting capabilities can be somewhat limited, requiring additional tools or plugins for more advanced reporting and analysis.
  • Not Ideal for UI Testing
    JMeter is not suitable for front-end or UI testing, as it is primarily designed for performance and load testing of backend services.
  • Memory Consumption
    The GUI mode, in particular, can consume a significant amount of memory, impacting performance during large-scale tests.

gatling.io videos

+ Add

Gatling Introduction

Apache JMeter videos

+ Add

Book Review - Master Apache JMeter - From load testing to DevOps

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to gatling.io and Apache JMeter)

gatling.io

Apache JMeter

Monitoring Tools
48 48%
Monitoring Tools
52% 52
Website Testing
25 25%
Website Testing
75% 75
Software Testing
0 0%
Software Testing
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using gatling.io and Apache JMeter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare gatling.io and Apache JMeter

gatling.io Reviews

We have no reviews of gatling.io yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache JMeter Reviews

Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2019 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, gatling.io seems to be a lot more popular than Apache JMeter. While we know about 22 links to gatling.io, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Apache JMeter. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

gatling.io mentions (22)

View more

Apache JMeter mentions (2)

  • Java naming facts
    Before Jakarta EE there was Apache Jakarta which was effectively the group name for Java based projects within the Apache project. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Are servers multithreaded by default?
    If you remove Spring from the equation you need to build the servlets yourself (according to the Sevlet API). You probably package the servlets in a war-file (with some configuration files), the war-file can then be deployed in a servlet server (ie Tomcat,). The sevlet servser usually handles the thread pool and other resources (ie database connection pools) for you, so you "only" have to provide a servlet that... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing gatling.io and Apache JMeter, you can also consider the following products

locust - An open source load testing tool written in Python.

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

soapUI - SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

Loading...