Software Alternatives & Reviews

Capybara VS JUnit

Compare Capybara VS JUnit and see what are their differences

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.

JUnit logo JUnit

JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05
  • JUnit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-12

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

JUnit videos

Code Review of example Project for JUnit 5 Tests

More videos:

  • Review - JUnit - Features
  • Review - JUnit test case example in Java – CM004

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Capybara and JUnit)
Automated Testing
31 31%
69% 69
Testing
31 31%
69% 69
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Capybara and JUnit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

JUnit might be a bit more popular than Capybara. We know about 16 links to it since March 2021 and only 11 links to Capybara. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Capybara mentions (11)

  • 16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
    Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Using Capybara to test responsive code
    Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Minitest vs. RSpec in Rails
    Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • From partials to ViewComponents: writing reusable front-end code in Rails
    The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Tip: if you're changing all your form_for to form_with, take the opportunity to make sure all forms are being tested.
    To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

JUnit mentions (16)

  • Setting up Continuous Integration
    Unlike I expected, setting up the project with Junit proved to be really time-consuming for me. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Adding testing for my java project
    First, I chose a testing framework for my java project. JUnit is the most pupular testing framework for java. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How to prevent NullPointerExceptions in Java
    This code defines a JUnit test case for the getStrings() method of the MyClass class. Then it creates an instance of MyClass, calls the getStrings() method, and asserts that the result is not null using the assertNotNull() method. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • JUnit 5: link tests with task tracker issues
    How you can link JUnit 5 tests with issues in your task tracker systems? - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DevOps Tooling Landscape
    JUnit is a popular Java testing framework used for unit testing. It's an open-source tool that's designed to make it easy for developers to write and run automated tests. JUnit provides a set of annotations and assertions that can be used to define test cases and expected outcomes, and it can be easily integrated with other DevOps tools like Jenkins and Maven. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Capybara and JUnit, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks