Software Alternatives & Reviews

Capybara VS locust

Compare Capybara VS locust and see what are their differences

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.

locust logo locust

An open source load testing tool written in Python.
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05
  • locust Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

locust videos

Locust review - GTA Online guides

More videos:

  • Review - GTA Online: Ocelot Locust Review
  • Review - GTA 5 - DLC Vehicle Customization - Ocelot Locust and Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Capybara and locust)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
14 14%
86% 86

User comments

Share your experience with using Capybara and locust. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, locust should be more popular than Capybara. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Capybara mentions (11)

  • 16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
    Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Using Capybara to test responsive code
    Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Minitest vs. RSpec in Rails
    Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • From partials to ViewComponents: writing reusable front-end code in Rails
    The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Tip: if you're changing all your form_for to form_with, take the opportunity to make sure all forms are being tested.
    To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

locust mentions (55)

  • Why Quarkus Native (probably) does not fit your project
    Finally, let's compare the response time of the requests. For that, we will use Locust , an open source load testing tool. The tests will run for 5 minutes, and will increase 4 requests per second every second until they reach 1000 requests per second. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • What is Load Testing? Complete Tutorial With Best Practices
    Locust: Another open-source tool, Locust is particularly flexible due to its support for Python scripts. It can conduct load tests across multiple machines, making it possible to simulate millions of users simultaneously. An exceptional feature of Locust is its web-based UI, which allows real-time tracking of performance metrics during test execution. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • API Load Testing: Enhance Your Skills with Locust
    Locust is a perfect tool to use on such occasion:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    So, in theory, we can handle 300 requests per minute on a single server which was the assumption we started with. After this, I decided to play with this configuration and see what we could achieve. But, to go ahead I need a system to measure the metrics of our load testing. So I quickly set up Locust on my system. Locust is an open-source easy to setup load-testing framework. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The Power of Traces: Learn by Contributing to OpenTelemetry
    The OpenTelemetry Demo is composed of microservices written in different programming languages that talk to each other over gRPC and HTTP; and a load generator which uses Locust to fake user traffic. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Capybara and locust, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

gatling.io - Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty