CapSolver Reviews

1. georkings

   7 months ago
   High Success Rate, Exceptional Support

   I use Capsolver to solve mainly recaptcha v2 and v3 via API. It helps me to bypass those captcha with a good success rate. It's a cheap service with very good documentation for API service, and the staff is very helpful and friendly. Capsolver solves recaptcha v2 pretty fast and with an extremely high success rate. When I've had problems with v3, they have helped me out to increase the success rate.

   🏁 Competitors: NextCaptcha
2. DamnKarma

   · Engineer at Bosch · over 2 years ago
   Best working Capcha solver!

   I've been using CapSolver for a while now, and it has been a game-changer when it comes to dealing with those annoying captchas. This addon simplifies the whole process and saves me a ton of time. It's incredibly reliable and efficient, making it a must-have tool for anyone who encounters captchas regularly. I appreciate the convenience it brings to my online activities, and I highly recommend CapSolver to anyone looking for a dependable captcha-solving solution.

   🏁 Competitors: NopeCHA, hektCapcha

   👍 Pros:    Fast|Active live support|Very reliable|Best captcha solver available
3. Luna5829

   almost 3 years ago

   I recently tried out Capsolver in my app, and I'm fairly impressed with its accuracy. There are some issues regarding speed, where if you try to send multiple requests at the same time (with threading), it can take a really long time (4 requests all at once took upwards of 45 seconds), but that's solved using proxies. It was also extremely easy to integrate it into my program, and the API is really user-friendly.

   👍 Pros:    Accuracy|User-friendly|Api integration

   👎 Cons:    Speed

Fresh Framework Reviews

CapSolver mentions (0)

Fresh Framework mentions (70)

• You're Doing Rails Wrong

  It's not so bad if you're doing it professionally because you pretty much set it up once and you're done. But yeah it's annoying for one-off projects or if web dev isn't your main job. That said you can avoid it. I wrote a website using Fresh (https://fresh.deno.dev/) and that was the only thing I needed. Incredibly simple compared to the usual Node/Webpack mess. Plus you're writing in Typescript, and can use TSX.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Deno 2.4

  I would highly recommend giving Deno Fresh[1] a go, it has a lot of the same features as Next.js but I find it to result in a much cleaner codebase overall. This coupled with Deno's built in KV store and hosted on Deploy makes for quite a zen workflow to be honest. [1]: https://fresh.deno.dev. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• FDLD - Fatigue Driven Lack of Development

  Ummm... Well I am mostly a web dev so I will try out the Fresh 🍋 framework to make something simple like an app where a user can log their mood (why not 🦀). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Let's talk metaframeworks

  Fresh. Deno-based full-stack web framework using…. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• 5 things I like about Deno

  Everything changed when I started "Tear Down and Rebuild" my blog. After many times of hesitating and pondering over technology choices, the name Fresh appeared. However, Fresh requires Deno as its runtime environment. Having no prior deployment experience but thinking "it's just a JavaScript runtime environment!" gave me more confidence. The next story is this article. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago