
The Useless Web
Pointer Pointer
Procatinator
SankeyMATIC
TheOldNet
Gizmodo
YouTube
Robot-created GIF + music mashups

Conduktor
UI for Apache Kafka
Kpow by Factor House
KafkaHQ
Lenses.io
Redis Commander
Another Redis DeskTop Manager
Self-hosted console for Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis: one permission model, production guardrails and a tamper-evident audit trail.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Cachemonet seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | cachemonet.com | broka.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Turkey · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Cachemonet yet.
BROKA is a self-hosted operations console for Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis, with Memcached operated as a cache. It runs on your own infrastructure with Docker Compose; there is no hosted version. – One permission model: users, teams and scoped roles across every broker you connect. –...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Cachemonet videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
BROKA — One platform for your messaging infrastructure
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Cachemonet and BROKA.
BROKA's answer:
BROKA operates Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis, with Memcached as a cache, from one self-hosted console. They share one permission model, one set of environments and one tamper-evident audit trail.
Most tools cover a single broker, so a team that runs several ends up with a separate UI, login and permission set for each.
BROKA's answer:
BROKA's answer:
Platform, SRE and backend teams who operate message brokers and caches in production, and the team leads who need to know who can change what, and who did.
BROKA's answer:
Inside one company, different teams often run different brokers with different tools: one team on Kafka with its own UI, another on the RabbitMQ management UI, a third on the Redis CLI. Each has its own logins and permissions, and nobody has one picture of which service uses which topic or queue, who owns it, or who changed what.
The changes that hurt are usually the routine ones, like an offset reset on the wrong consumer group or a purge on the wrong queue. BROKA puts those brokers under the same roles, guardrails and audit trail.
BROKA's answer:
Share your experience with using Cachemonet and BROKA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Alrighty! Ignore my other comments hahaha. I think what we're looking for here is cachemonet.com. Source: about 5 years ago
Tracking BROKA since Nov 2026.
When comparing Cachemonet and BROKA, you can also consider the following products.

The Useless Web is a massive collection of some of the world’s most pointless websites.
Compare The Useless Web to Cachemonet or BROKA:


Pointer Pointer is an entertainment and fun site that allows users to have fun with their cursor.
Compare Pointer Pointer to Cachemonet or BROKA:

Open-Source Web GUI for Apache Kafka Management
Compare UI for Apache Kafka to Cachemonet or BROKA:

Random full screen cat gifs to music. Need I say more?
Compare Procatinator to Cachemonet or BROKA:

Advanced Apache Kafka UI for monitoring and analytics
Compare Kpow by Factor House to Cachemonet or BROKA: