Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BundlePhobia VS CMake

Compare BundlePhobia VS CMake and see what are their differences

BusinessXray
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

BundlePhobia logo BundlePhobia

Find the performance impact of adding a npm package to your bundle.

CMake logo CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
  • BundlePhobia Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-14
  • CMake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-21

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

BundlePhobia features and specs

  • Size Analysis
    BundlePhobia allows developers to easily check the size of npm packages before including them in their projects, helping to keep overall project size down.
  • Dependency Insight
    It provides insights into package dependencies, enabling developers to understand what additional packages might be included with a primary package.
  • Speed Optimization
    By identifying large packages, developers can make informed decisions to optimize their application's load times and performance.
  • Comparative Analysis
    BundlePhobia allows for comparison between different versions of a package or between different packages, assisting in selecting the optimal package for a project.
  • Easy to Use
    The user interface of BundlePhobia is straightforward and intuitive, making it accessible for developers of all experience levels.

Possible disadvantages of BundlePhobia

  • Limited to npm
    BundlePhobia only analyzes packages available on npm, so developers using other package managers like Yarn might not find full compatibility.
  • Dynamic Challenges
    Dynamic dependencies or environment-specific issues are not accounted for, which might lead to inaccuracies in the real-world size analysis.
  • Cache Delay
    There may be a delay in updates due to caching, meaning newly published versions of packages may not be immediately visible on BundlePhobia.
  • Single Metric Focus
    The focus is largely on package size, without considering other important factors such as performance impact, security vulnerabilities, or overall package quality.
  • Requires Internet Connection
    Developers need an active internet connection to access BundlePhobia's web-based service, which can limit usability in offline environments.

CMake features and specs

  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages of CMake

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Analysis of CMake

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

BundlePhobia videos

No BundlePhobia videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CMake videos

+ Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

  • Review - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert โ€œUsing Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Designโ€
  • Review - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BundlePhobia and CMake)

BundlePhobia

CMake

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
JavaScript Tools
100 100%
JavaScript Tools
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BundlePhobia and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

BundlePhobia might be a bit more popular than CMake. We know about 59 links to it since March 2021 and only 55 links to CMake. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BundlePhobia mentions (59)

  • Modern React Performance Without the Overhead
    Check packages on Bundlephobia before importing. A date-picker that pulls in 80 KB gzipped when you need one function is a problem you choose. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • JavaScript Bundle Size Optimization: From 2MB to 200KB โ€” A Practical Guide
    Before adding any npm package, check bundlephobia.com for the bundle cost. Example: lodash costs 70KB โ€” lodash-es with tree shaking costs 0-70KB depending on what you import. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Your package.json Is Lying to You
    Or use bundlephobia.com for a nicer view of what actually ends up in your bundle. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Bundle size badges are just numbers
    There are two excellent services for estimating package size - Bundlephobia and Package Phobia. While the first calculates "bundle size", the second calculates "publish size" and "install size". The "install size" is the result of recursively summing up all the package dependencies. The result of such an evaluation may surprise. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • The hidden costs in your pacakge.json
    We can use bundlephobia.com to quickly check the โ€˜costโ€™ of adding a npm library to your bundle. Upon checking, it tells us moment.js clocks in at around 300KB, while date-fns is a much leaner 77KB:. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

CMake mentions (55)

  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Creating a Native Desktop GUI Using C++ with GTK
    I used CMAKE to define the build configurations. I find it very convenient that CMAKE generates the Makefile on Linux and can also create a Visual Studio project on Windows. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.
    CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BundlePhobia and CMake, you can also consider the following products

GTmetrix - GTmetrix is a free tool that analyzes your page's speed performance. Using PageSpeed and YSlow, GTmetrix generates scores for your pages and offers actionable recommendations on how to fix them.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

WebPagetest - Run a free website speed test from multiple locations around the globe using real browsers...

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Loading...