Changelog software that turns GitHub commits into release notes your users actually see — inside your app. Built for founders and teams who ship fast.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, BuiltWith
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
162 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
162 vs 0
Market Research popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
207 vs 18
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Comprehensive Technology Profiling BuiltWith provides detailed information about the technologies that websites are using, including analytics tools, content management systems, e-commerce platforms, and more. This can be incredibly useful for market research and competitive analysis.
Market Reports The platform offers in-depth market reports that can help businesses understand technology trends across different industries. This data can be crucial for strategic planning and technology adoption decisions.
Lead Generation BuiltWith can be used to generate leads by identifying websites that use specific technologies. This helps sales teams target potential clients who are already using a competitor's tool or a complementary technology.
Customizable Alerts Users can set up alerts to get notified whenever a website starts or stops using specific technologies. This feature helps businesses stay updated with market shifts and competitor movements in real-time.
Ease of Use The interface is relatively user-friendly, making it easy for users to search for websites and technologies without requiring any advanced technical skills.
Possible disadvantages
Pricing BuiltWith can be quite expensive, particularly for small businesses and startups. The high cost may make it inaccessible for companies with limited budgets.
Data Accuracy While generally reliable, the data provided by BuiltWith may not always be 100% accurate or up-to-date. This can sometimes lead to incorrect assumptions or decisions based on outdated information.
Limited Free Features The free version of BuiltWith offers limited features and capabilities, which may not be sufficient for in-depth research or analysis. Users often need to upgrade to a premium plan to access the full range of functionalities.
Complex Data The detailed data and extensive lists of technologies can sometimes be overwhelming to sift through without specialized knowledge or a clear strategy, making it less useful for casual users.
Dependency on External Data BuiltWith relies on external data sources, which means that any limitations or issues with these sources can affect the quality and comprehensiveness of the information provided.
Unified Dashboard Stackd provides a single, centralized dashboard to manage and organize multiple subscriptions, tools, and services, reducing the need to juggle between different platforms.
Subscription Tracking The platform helps users keep track of all their active subscriptions, making it easier to monitor spending and avoid forgotten or redundant subscriptions that waste money.
Clean and Simple Interface Stackd offers a straightforward, user-friendly interface that makes it easy for individuals and teams to get started and manage their software stacks without a steep learning curve.
Cost Optimization By providing visibility into all subscriptions and tools in one place, Stackd helps users identify overlapping services and opportunities to cut unnecessary costs.
Stack Organization Users can categorize and organize their tools into logical groupings or stacks, making it easier to understand their tech ecosystem and share it with team members or stakeholders.
Possible disadvantages
Limited Awareness and Community Stackd is a relatively niche product with a smaller user base, which means fewer community resources, reviews, and peer experiences to draw from compared to more established alternatives.
Feature Depth May Be Limited As a newer or smaller platform, Stackd may lack some advanced features like deep analytics, automated cancellation, or robust integrations that more mature subscription management tools offer.
Dependency on Manual Input Users may need to manually add and update their subscriptions and tools, which can be time-consuming and prone to becoming outdated if not regularly maintained.
Limited Integrations Stackd may not integrate with all the financial tools, banking platforms, or software ecosystems that users rely on, reducing its ability to automatically sync and track subscription data.
Unclear Long-Term Viability As a smaller product, there may be uncertainty around its long-term roadmap, continued development, and support, which could be a concern for users looking for a reliable long-term solution.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
BuiltWithStackd
Overall verdict
Yes, BuiltWith is considered a good resource for analyzing the technology behind websites due to its comprehensive data and ease of use. It is widely used by professionals to gain a competitive edge and to streamline technology-related decisions.
Why this product is good
BuiltWith is a valuable tool for web developers, marketers, and businesses as it provides insights into the technology stack of any website. It helps in understanding market trends, gaining competitive intelligence, and making informed decisions for technology adoption.
Recommended for
Web developers looking to understand how different sites are built and which technologies are used.
Digital marketers aiming to gather competitive insights and trend analysis.
Businesses wanting to assess potential technology partners and competitors.
Investors conducting due diligence on companies by understanding their technological dependencies.
Overall verdict
Stackd appears to be a solid, purpose-built tool for its niche, offering a streamlined experience that helps users organize and manage their workflows more efficiently. As with any service, its value depends on how well it fits your specific needs, so a free trial or demo is recommended before committing.
Why this product is good
Focused, purpose-built design that targets a specific workflow rather than trying to do everything
Clean and intuitive user interface that reduces the learning curve for new users
Time-saving automation and organization features that streamline repetitive tasks
Responsive customer support and regular product updates
Flexible plans that can scale with individual users or growing teams
Recommended for
Professionals looking to centralize and organize their work in one place
Small to medium-sized teams needing a lightweight collaboration tool
Users who value simplicity and a clean interface over feature bloat
Anyone wanting to automate repetitive tasks and improve productivity
Startups and freelancers seeking an affordable, scalable solution
A great tool to help you discover the technology being used by a variety of websites. I was impressed that upon signing up that I had full access to a free list of leads.
Sometimes, BuiltWith may not fit your specific business needs. If so, we’ve compiled our list of best BuiltWith alternatives you may want to consider for your profiling.
BuiltWith is a truly comprehensive tool that will mine a ton of information from anyone’s site and serve it to you in a manner you will be able to crunch and use it. You might take your time since it is a lot of...
Evan You, creator of Vue.js, is a prime example. Vivek Nair, Co-Founder of BotGauge, notes that You “created something that addresses real developer needs with clean logic and thoughtful design.” Vue.js powers over 1.5 million websites...
- Source: dev.to
/
over 1 year ago
There exist websites like https://builtwith.com so answer to your question is yes.
- Source: Hacker News
/
almost 2 years ago
Ask HN: Tech Stack Behind the Claude App?
BuiltWith says the web client is NextJS which is interesting as ChatGPT made a big switch away to Remix IIRC. https://builtwith.com/?https%3a%2f%2fclaude.ai%2fnew.
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 2 years ago
