Built for Mars VS React Complex Tree

Compare Built for Mars VS React Complex Tree and see what are their differences

WorkProcedures

Generate professional standard operating procedures in minutes. AI-powered SOP creation built on 10,000+ industry procedures. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

React Complex Tree

Unopinionated accessible tree component with drag and drop

Landing page //
2023-07-12

Landing page //
2023-10-14

Built for Mars

Website: builtformars.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

React Complex Tree

Website: rct.lukasbach.com
$ Details

Edit details

Built for Mars features and specs

Expert Analysis
Built for Mars provides detailed and expert analysis of user experience design and product interfaces, making it valuable for designers seeking informed insights.
Comprehensive Reviews
The platform offers thorough reviews of various digital products, allowing users to understand strengths and weaknesses from a UX perspective.
Educational Content
Built for Mars offers educational content that is beneficial for both novice and experienced designers aiming to improve their design skills.
Engaging Visualization
Utilizes engaging visualizations to convey UX findings, making complex information more digestible and accessible.

Possible disadvantages of Built for Mars

Limited Scope
The analysis provided by Built for Mars may be limited to specific industries or product types, potentially leaving out broader design insights.
Subjectivity
As with any analysis, the insights can be subjective and influenced by the analyst's perspective, which may not always align with all users' experiences.
Access Restrictions
Certain content or reports may be behind paywalls or require subscriptions, which could restrict access for some users.
Update Frequency
The frequency of updates or new analyses may not be sufficient for users looking for the latest UX trends and evaluations.

React Complex Tree features and specs

Customizability
React Complex Tree offers a high degree of customizability, allowing developers to tailor the tree component to fit their specific needs. This can be especially useful for creating unique UI experiences.
Feature-Rich
The library includes a wide range of features out of the box such as drag-and-drop support, keyboard navigation, and dynamic data loading, which can save development time.
Accessibility Support
React Complex Tree is designed with accessibility in mind, providing support for ARIA attributes and keyboard interactions, which helps ensure that applications are usable by people with disabilities.
Performance
The component is optimized for performance, handling large data sets efficiently without significant slowdowns, which is critical for applications that manage extensive hierarchical structures.
Community and Documentation
The library has a supportive community and well-structured documentation, providing developers with ample resources to troubleshoot and extend its functionality.

Possible disadvantages of React Complex Tree

Complexity
Due to its extensive features and customizability, React Complex Tree can be complex to set up and configure properly, which may lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
Bundle Size
As a feature-rich component, React Complex Tree can increase your bundle size, which might be a concern for projects where performance and loading time are critical.
Third-Party Dependency
Relying on a third-party library introduces dependencies outside of your control, which may present challenges in terms of long-term maintenance and potential update or deprecation issues.
Specific Use Case Tailoring
While it offers a lot of features, developers may find that very specific use cases require additional effort to customize or extend the component beyond its intended use.

Analysis of React Complex Tree

Overall verdict

React Complex Tree is a solid, headless React library for building tree-view UI components, offering strong accessibility support, drag-and-drop, multi-selection, and search out of the box, while giving developers full control over styling and rendering. It's a good choice for developers who need a robust, unstyled tree component without reinventing complex interaction logic.

Why this product is good

Headless design gives full control over styling and markup, making it easy to integrate with any design system or CSS framework
Built-in accessibility (ARIA-compliant, keyboard navigation) saves significant development time
Supports advanced features like drag-and-drop reordering, multi-selection, and renaming out of the box
Actively maintained with good documentation and TypeScript support
Flexible data model that supports both controlled and uncontrolled tree state management
Free and open-source with no licensing costs

Recommended for

Developers building file explorers, folder structures, or nested navigation menus
Teams that need a customizable tree component that matches their existing design system
Projects requiring accessible, keyboard-navigable tree interfaces
Applications needing drag-and-drop reordering of hierarchical data
TypeScript-based React projects seeking type-safe tree components
Developers who prefer headless UI libraries over pre-styled component kits

Built for Mars videos

+ Add

Built for Mars | Peter Ramsey

React Complex Tree videos

No React Complex Tree videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Built for Mars and React Complex Tree)

React Complex Tree

Design Tools

80 80%

Design Tools

20% 20

User Experience

100 100%

User Experience

0% 0

Developer Tools

0 0%

Developer Tools

100% 100

Education

100 100%

Education

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Built for Mars and React Complex Tree. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Built for Mars should be more popular than React Complex Tree. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Built for Mars mentions (7)

Design is about experience: 5 UX trends to be aware of
Maybe I’m looking in the wrong places but I’m tired of seeing numbered lists of “Design trends to look out for in 202X” with 4 sentences of text between them. I crave longer forms of writing that explains the design aspect of this field. (The only resource I’ve found satisfying was Built for Mars ). Source: over 3 years ago
Ask HN: How to learn design and UI/UX
Some other recommendations: Don’t Make me Think and Rocket Surgery Made Easy by Steve Krug https://builtformars.com/ UX case studies https://www.nngroup.com/ UX analyses and articles Coursera has some UX courses you can audit for free. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
portfolio tips and advices
Consider that even if you don't have a big portfolio of work, you can do analysis of existing apps / websites / experiences, even a game. Take a look at the case studies here: https://builtformars.com/. Source: almost 4 years ago
Thought the Rotten Tomatoes mobile site could use a bit of work
You might enjoy these case studies: builtformars.com They are slides + articles instead of video but very interesting and entertaining. Source: almost 4 years ago
Sources to start
There are also nice walkthrough websites you can learn a lot from: Growth.design Built for Mars. Source: about 4 years ago

React Complex Tree mentions (2)

I'm building react-complex-tree, an unopinionated tree component for react, and recently released a new version!
You can find the source code for it at https://github.com/lukasbach/react-complex-tree, and documentation and examples at https://rct.lukasbach.com. Source: over 3 years ago
I made an Unopinionated Accessible Tree Component with Multi-Select and Drag-And-Drop
More examples on the customizability, in-depth documentation and a typing API is available at the documentation homepage: https://rct.lukasbach.com/. Source: about 5 years ago