Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bubblewrap VS Windows Sandbox

Compare Bubblewrap VS Windows Sandbox and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Bubblewrap logo Bubblewrap

Unprivileged sandboxing tool

Windows Sandbox logo Windows Sandbox

a new lightweight desktop environment tailored for safely running applications in isolation.
  • Bubblewrap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-08
  • Windows Sandbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-22

Bubblewrap features and specs

  • Security
    Bubblewrap provides enhanced security by allowing applications to run in a sandboxed environment, minimizing the risk of malicious code affecting the host system.
  • Isolation
    It offers strong isolation features by creating a separate filesystem namespace, limiting an application's ability to interact with the host filesystem.
  • Lightweight
    Bubblewrap is a lightweight solution compared to full-fledged container solutions, making it suitable for simple sandboxing without the overhead of containers.
  • Flexibility
    It provides flexibility to configure namespaces, capabilities, and cgroups, allowing fine-grained control over the sandbox environment.
  • Minimal dependencies
    Bubblewrap has minimal dependencies, which makes it easier to install and use across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Bubblewrap

  • Complexity
    Configuring Bubblewrap for complex applications might require significant effort and knowledge about Linux namespaces and security settings.
  • Limited scope
    Bubblewrap is focused on namespace isolation, so it might not provide all the features of a full container solution, such as networking and resource management.
  • Compatibility
    Some applications might not work correctly within a Bubblewrap sandbox if they require certain system-level features or access to particular file paths.
  • Lack of persistence
    Any changes made within the Bubblewrap sandbox are not persisted across sessions, which might not be suitable for applications needing data persistence.
  • User namespace limitations
    On systems with older kernels or restrictive configurations, user namespaces required by Bubblewrap might not be available, limiting its usage.

Windows Sandbox features and specs

  • Security
    Windows Sandbox provides a lightweight, isolated desktop environment where you can run applications safely without affecting the host system.
  • Convenience
    It comes pre-installed with Windows 10 Pro or Enterprise, so there's no need for separate installation or configuration. It's ready to use out of the box.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with Windows, allowing easy access to copy and paste functions between the main OS and the sandbox.
  • Efficiency
    It's a lightweight virtual machine, consuming relatively few system resources compared to traditional virtual machines.
  • Disposable Environment
    Each session is temporary. Upon closing, everything is discarded with no impact on the host OS, offering a fresh environment each time.

Possible disadvantages of Windows Sandbox

  • Limited Configuration
    Users have limited control over the sandbox environment, with minimal options for configuration and personalization.
  • Windows 10 Pro/Enterprise Requirement
    Windows Sandbox is only available for Windows 10 Pro or Enterprise users, excluding those on the Home edition.
  • Hardware Requirements
    Requires a machine with virtualization capabilities enabled in BIOS, as well as specific system requirements that not all hardware may meet.
  • Resource Consumption
    While more efficient than full virtual machines, it still utilizes system resources that might impact performance on low-end computers.

Bubblewrap videos

Glossier Bubblewrap Review + MORE | zoerudd

More videos:

  • Review - GLOSSIER BUBBLEWRAP EYE CREAM * Review + First Impressions
  • Review - GLOSSIER BUBBLEWRAP REVIEW...HMMM

Windows Sandbox videos

Review Topic #5 (Windows Sandbox)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bubblewrap and Windows Sandbox)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Email Marketing
100 100%
0% 0
Virtual Machine Management

User comments

Share your experience with using Bubblewrap and Windows Sandbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bubblewrap seems to be a lot more popular than Windows Sandbox. While we know about 30 links to Bubblewrap, we've tracked only 1 mention of Windows Sandbox. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bubblewrap mentions (30)

  • Vet is a safety net for the risky curl | bash pattern
    There are some more obvious things you should do (in order): 1. Have backups. You are running software all the time that can corrupt your files either maliciously or, more likely, accidentally. It doesn't really matter where it comes from, 2. Get into the habit of running things in sandboxes. You don't need anything magical here, a separate (unprivileged) user account is a good enough sandbox for many things. I... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Announcing Styrolite: A New Low Level Container Runtime for Linux
    Ariadne Conill, Founder and Distinguished Engineer at Edera, highlighted the necessity for a new low-level container runtime in a recent blog post. Existing solutions like Bubblewrap and util-linuxโ€™s unshare rely heavily on complex command-line interfaces or lack the required programming control, making them error-prone. In contrast, high-level solutions like Kubernetes' Container Runtime Interface (CRI) abstract... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Popular GitHub Action tj-actions/changed-files is compromised
    This is exactly what the tool bubblewrap[1] is built for. It is pretty easy to wrap binaries with it and it gives you control over exactly what permissions you want in the namespace. [1]: https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • How to run GUI applications directly in containers
    Another thing to look at is bubblewrap (https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap), which is what implements the sandboxing in Flatpak. It's handy on it's if you want to run a command from your host in a particular sandbox as kind of a one-off. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • HardenedBSD Feature Comparison with OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD
    > Not requiring the cooperation of developers to opt-in, for starters. True, meaningful in the general case, and completely irrelevant in this particular case, which started with specifically the question of OpenBSD applying the protection in question to its own base system. I actually agree that being able to externally impose a sandbox is super useful, but self-imposed restrictions are perfectly applicable in... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

Windows Sandbox mentions (1)

  • Am I on the right track here? I'm new to setting up VMs
    Also, did you look into just working with Windows Sandbox for your purposes? Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bubblewrap and Windows Sandbox, you can also consider the following products

Firejail - security sandbox

VirtualBox - VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as...

Sandboxie-Plus - Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32- and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems.

VMware Workstation - VMware Workstation is a multiple operating system handler to easily evaluate the any other type of new operating systems.

Sandboxie - Sandboxie is a program for Windows that is designed to allow the user to isolate individual programs on the hard drive.

QEMU - QEMU (short for "Quick EMUlator") is a free and open-source hosted hypervisor that...