Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

BrowserStack VS soapUI

Compare BrowserStack VS soapUI and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

soapUI logo soapUI

SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • soapUI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

soapUI

Website
smartbear.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

soapUI features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    soapUI supports a wide range of testing types including functional, security, and load testing, providing a one-stop solution for API testing needs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool features an intuitive graphical user interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Extensive Protocol Support
    soapUI supports multiple protocols like SOAP, REST, JMS, AMF, as well as a range of underlying technologies including HTTP, HTTPS, JMS, etc., offering flexibility in testing different kinds of APIs.
  • Scripting Capability
    With Groovy scripting support, users can create custom assertions, automation scripts, and add advanced logic to their tests.
  • Community and Documentation
    A large community of users and extensive documentation and tutorials are available, aiding in faster troubleshooting and learning.
  • Integrations
    soapUI integrates well with other tools such as Jenkins, Maven, and JIRA, streamlining the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Open Source Version
    The availability of an open-source version allows users to start testing without any initial cost.

Possible disadvantages of soapUI

  • Performance Issues
    soapUI can become slow, especially with large and complex projects, which can affect productivity.
  • High Memory Usage
    The application often consumes a significant amount of memory, leading to potential performance degradation on less powerful machines.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are user-friendly, mastering advanced functionalities and scripting capabilities can be challenging for beginners.
  • Limited Advanced Reporting
    The reporting capabilities in the open-source version are quite basic compared to other commercial API testing tools.
  • Paid Licensing for Pro Features
    Many advanced features and more efficient workflows are locked behind the paid 'Pro' version, which might not be affordable for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • UI Glitches
    Users occasionally report glitches and bugs in the graphical user interface, which can be inconvenient and interrupt workflow.
  • Lack of Cloud Deployment
    As of now, soapUI does not offer a cloud-native or SaaS version, limiting flexibility for teams that prefer cloud-based tools.

Analysis of BrowserStack

Overall verdict

  • Overall, BrowserStack is considered a highly effective and reliable tool in the web development and testing community. Its extensive features, real-device testing capabilities, and seamless integration make it a good choice for those needing comprehensive cross-browser testing solutions.

Why this product is good

  • BrowserStack is a robust and widely used web testing platform that provides developers with the ability to test their websites and applications across a vast array of browsers and devices. It offers real device cloud testing, ensuring that users can assess how their applications perform on actual devices rather than simulations. This makes it an invaluable tool for identifying and resolving cross-browser compatibility issues. Additionally, it integrates with popular CI/CD tools, enhancing the workflow efficiency for development teams.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA engineers
  • Agile development teams
  • Companies needing cross-browser testing across multiple devices
  • Teams looking for CI/CD integration in their testing process

Analysis of soapUI

Overall verdict

  • Overall, SoapUI is considered a good tool for API testing, particularly for those looking for an all-in-one solution. Its extensive feature set and flexibility in handling different test scenarios make it a reliable choice in the industry. However, users should be aware of its potentially steep learning curve and resource-intensive nature, especially with large test suites.

Why this product is good

  • SoapUI is widely regarded as a robust tool for API testing due to its comprehensive set of features, including functional testing, security testing, and load testing capabilities. It offers a user-friendly interface that allows both technical and non-technical users to create and execute tests with ease. Furthermore, SoapUI supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, JMS, and HTTP, making it versatile for various testing scenarios.

Recommended for

    SoapUI is recommended for QA engineers, developers, and testers who need a powerful tool to test APIs thoroughly. It is suitable for organizations that require detailed and comprehensive API testing solutions and are looking for a tool that can integrate with their DevOps processes. Additionally, teams using multiple API protocols will benefit from SoapUI's versatility.

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

soapUI videos

+ Add

REST API Automation - SoapUI OpenSource Review - Mac

More videos:

  • Review - Testing REST API with SoapUI OpenSource - Part 6 - Assertions - Mac
  • Review - SoapUI Certification : Basic details about certification

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and soapUI)

BrowserStack

soapUI

Website Testing
66 66%
Website Testing
34% 34
Automated Testing
66 66%
Automated Testing
34% 34
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Software Testing
44 44%
Software Testing
56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and soapUI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and soapUI

BrowserStack Reviews

Other alternatives to Tuskr
BrowserStack lets you test your website or app on actual phones, tablets, and browsers so you see exactly how it will work in real life. It also includes some basic test management features.
Source: testpad.com
Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

soapUI Reviews

Top 20 Open Source & Cloud Free Postman Alternatives (2024 Updated)
Product Introduction: SoapUI is a robust tool for testing SOAP and REST APIs, known for its extensive testing capabilities, including functional, load, and security testing, which makes it the perfect postman alternative.
Source: medium.com
Best Postman Alternatives To Consider in 2025
This open-source tool caters specifically to SOAP and RESTful web services. SoapUI excels in security testing, with features like load testing and functional testing. While not as beginner friendly as Postman, SoapUI offers a comprehensive solution for more complex API testing needs.
Source: www.hypertest.co
Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring
SoapUI is a popular open-source and commercial API testing tool (the commercial is called ReadyAPI), due to its powerful capabilities, flexibility and user-friendly platform. It’s particularly effective for testing SOAP, REST and GraphQL APIs. SoapUI allows inputting the WSDL or endpoint URL, configuring the requests with headers, parameters, or body content and sending the...
Source: www.blazemeter.com
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
SoapUI provides security and load testing features, and its functional testing supports SOAP and REST API. Users can use SoapUI’s drag-and-drop or point-and-click for scripting features, creating and running automated regression, compliance, and load tests on Web API.
Source: testsigma.com
15 BEST SoapUI Alternatives (2022 Update)
SoapUI is a widely popular API testing tool. It allows you to test REST and SOAP protocols. It facilitates seamless integrations and reusability of scripts. However, load and workflow testing is difficult with SoapUI.
Source: www.guru99.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (8)

View more

soapUI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of soapUI yet. Tracking of soapUI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and soapUI, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loading...