Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BitBucket VS Webpacker

Compare BitBucket VS Webpacker and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

BitBucket logo BitBucket

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Webpacker logo Webpacker

Use Webpack to manage app-like JavaScript modules in Rails - rails/webpacker
  • BitBucket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • Webpacker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

BitBucket features and specs

  • Integration with Atlassian Suite
    BitBucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products like Jira, Confluence, and Trello, enabling end-to-end project management and enhanced collaboration capabilities.
  • Unlimited Private Repositories
    BitBucket offers unlimited private repositories, which is a significant advantage for developers and organizations that prioritize privacy and want to manage multiple projects securely.
  • Built-in CI/CD
    BitBucket Pipelines provides integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) right out of the box, making it easier for teams to automate their workflows and deploy code faster.
  • Cost-Effective
    BitBucket offers competitive pricing plans, including a free tier that supports small teams with essential features, making it accessible for startups and small to medium-sized businesses.
  • Strong Branch Permissions
    BitBucket allows for granular branch permissions, enabling teams to control who can read, write, and merge their code, enhancing security and boosting code quality.

Possible disadvantages of BitBucket

  • User Interface
    Some users find BitBucket's user interface less intuitive compared to competitors like GitHub and GitLab, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Performance Issues
    There can be occasional performance issues, particularly with larger repositories or heavy traffic, which can slow down the development and deployment processes.
  • Smaller Community
    BitBucket has a smaller user community compared to GitHub, which may result in fewer third-party integrations, plugins, and community-driven support resources.
  • Limited Marketplace
    The BitBucket Marketplace offers fewer integrations and extensions compared to its competitors, which might limit customization options for advanced users or larger teams.
  • Less Popular for Open Source Projects
    BitBucket is less popular for hosting open-source projects compared to platforms like GitHub, which might be a drawback for teams looking to engage with a broader open-source community.

Webpacker features and specs

  • Modern JavaScript Features
    Webpacker allows Rails applications to utilize modern JavaScript features and tools, such as ES6 syntax, JSX, and TypeScript, thereby enhancing the developer experience and code quality.
  • Asset Bundling
    It efficiently bundles multiple JavaScript files into a single package, reducing load times and improving performance by minimizing the number of HTTP requests.
  • Integration with Rails
    As an official Rails library, Webpacker integrates seamlessly with the Rails framework, ensuring that front-end builds are consistent and easier to manage alongside Ruby on Rails projects.
  • Configurable
    Provides a highly configurable environment, allowing developers to customize their JavaScript and asset builds extensively to meet specific project needs.
  • Community Support
    Being part of the Rails ecosystem, Webpacker benefits from an extensive community support, with a wealth of third-party resources, documentation, and plugins available.

Possible disadvantages of Webpacker

  • Complexity
    Webpacker can introduce additional complexity, especially for developers not familiar with JavaScript tooling or the webpack configuration, which can lead to a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction and tooling required by Webpacker can add performance overhead during development with slower compilation and building times compared to simpler asset management solutions.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies can become burdensome as Webpacker requires handling both the Ruby Gems and the JavaScript packages through yarn or npm, increasing maintenance efforts.
  • Migration Path
    As newer tools and techniques emerge, moving away from Webpacker could require significant refactoring efforts, especially for applications with extensive custom configurations.
  • Deprecated Status
    Webpacker is no longer the recommended default for new Rails applications starting from Rails 7, which now prefers using esbuild or importmaps, potentially affecting its long-term viability.

BitBucket videos

Bitbucket tutorial | How to use Bitbucket Cloud

More videos:

  • Review - Jira & Bitbucket Pull Request and Code Review Part-3 (Last Part)

Webpacker videos

RailsConf 2020 CE - Webpacker, It-Just-Works, But How? by Justin Gordon

More videos:

  • Review - Should you use React with Webpacker in your Rails project? Rails MVC vs Single Page App (SPA)!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BitBucket and Webpacker)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BitBucket and Webpacker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BitBucket and Webpacker

BitBucket Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Bitbucket offers several hosting options, including Cloud, Server, and Data Centre. Each option has its own unique features and benefits. For example, Bitbucket Cloud is hosted on Atlassian’s servers and accessed via a URL. It has an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool, Pipelines, that enables you to build, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
Most of the listed alternatives offer free tier plans for individuals or small teams. Tools like GitLab and Bitbucket allow users to host unlimited repositories without cost.
Source: snappify.com
Best GitHub Alternatives for Developers in 2023
Bitbucket Pipes provides over 50 plug-and-play integrations (code quality, deployment, incident management, etc.) for extended CI/CD workflow automation. Speaking of integrations, Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian programming tools like Opsgenie and Confluence, as well as third-party tools like CircleCI, GitHub and Jenkins.
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
The Pull Request workflow is so dominant now that it’s considered the default path for code to permanently enter into a repository. You can see a similar features in GitHub’s smaller competition Codeberg, GitLab, BitBucket, and Gitea. These competitors don’t offer other, major code collaboration tools, and their Pull Request-like features aren’t just there to help users come...
Free Data Science Tools for Students and Educators in 2020
You can get free unlimited private Git repositories at Bitbucket. If you already have a GitHub Pro, you may wonder why Bitbucket

Webpacker Reviews

We have no reviews of Webpacker yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BitBucket should be more popular than Webpacker. It has been mentiond 77 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BitBucket mentions (77)

  • Enhancing Open Source Visibility with License-Token
    Facilitated Collaboration and Funding: With easier identification comes better connectivity. Contributors, partners, and funders can more readily find projects that resonate with their interests and values. Moreover, platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket are increasingly interested in integrating standardized licensing solutions like License-Token, paving the way for broader adoption and collaborative... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Stop Risking Your Code: Move from Laptop to Git Today
    Git ensures that your code is safe. Even if your laptop crashes, your work is backed up on a remote repository (e.g., GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket). - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Git: Why Version Control is a Developer's Best Friend
    GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket: These platforms provide easy-to-use interfaces for Git, adding features like pull requests, issue tracking, and more. Explore GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Boost Your Coding Efficiency: 10 Productivity Tips for Developers
    Tools: Use platforms like Bitbucket or GitHub’s pull request feature. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Why Do I Love Open Source?
    We must be careful that the value, worth, and success of open-source projects are not measured by vanity metrics such as stars on GitHub or attempts at gaming the GitHub trending algorithm. For one thing, not all open source worth investment happens on GitHub, there are also platforms such as GitLab, Codeberg, and BitBucket where a lot of great work is being done. Some people also overblow the success of a... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Webpacker mentions (17)

  • React + Ruby on Rails without any gems
    We will use Webpacker or JavaScript compiler and assets management. By following the webpacker installation guide, let’s add Webpacker and React to our application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Collecting JavaScript code coverage with Capybara in Ruby on Rails application
    For example, there is a Ruby on Rails application that uses Webpacker and has JavaScript files that are covered by the system tests. Capybara is used as the system testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Asset Pipeline JS Migration
    Using Webpacker in Rails provides several advantages over the traditional asset pipeline. First, Webpacker uses JavaScript modules, which allows for better code organization and improved code reusability. Second, it offers modern frontend build tools, such as Babel and PostCSS, for transforming and compiling assets. Third, it provides faster build times and faster runtime performance through code splitting and... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Thank you Webpacker, Goodbye Webpacker
    This article is replace Webpacker with Simpacker and webpack. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How to setup ruby on rails + Angular
    In ruby ​​on rails 7 what is the best way to properly install Angular because I can't find any documentation about it. The only tutorial that exists uses webpacker (https://github.com/rails/webpacker) but unfortunately it is no longer supported and no longer up to date in terms of security. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BitBucket and Webpacker, you can also consider the following products

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Turbolinks - Turbolinks makes navigating your web application faster

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Pingy CLI - Making Modern Websites Should Be Easier. Pingy is Here To Help.