BitBucket
GitHub
GitLab
SourceForge
Assembla
Gitea
Phabricator
Launchpad.net
Codecov
CodeClimate
Codacy
Coveralls
SonarQube
ESLint
SensioLabs Insight
Source-Navigator NG
Bitbucket is recommended for software development teams that need strong integration with Jira and Confluence, teams looking for private repository support, and organizations that prioritize customizable workflows and detailed permission settings.
Codecov is recommended for development teams looking to enhance their code testing strategy with detailed coverage insights. It is particularly useful for projects that rely on CI/CD pipelines and value integration with platforms like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. Teams that employ diverse technology stacks can also benefit given Codecov's broad language support.
Based on our record, BitBucket should be more popular than Codecov. It has been mentiond 81 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
One last source of confusion worth clearing up. Git is the version control system itself, the underlying technology that does the change-tracking. GitHub is one popular place to host projects that use Git, and it is not the only one. GitLab and Bitbucket do much the same job. A beginner does not need to evaluate all three. Picking the one a tutorial or a friend already uses is a fine way to start because... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
While browsing the web, I came across a feature of GitKraken called Launchpad. This feature enables us to get a big-picture view of all issues and PRs where we are the creator or a follower. If you don’t know GitKraken, it is a Git client with an awesome UI for managing your repositories. You can use it as a desktop app, website, editor extension (GitLens), or the CLI. They have also released an MCP server in the... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
While Cursor supports bugbot for GitHub PR reviews, there’s nothing similar out-of-the-box for bitbucket users. Setting up Bitbucket MCP with Cursor changed that for me—and made my dev life a lot smoother. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
I am using GitHub for both personal and work projects. In the past, I used BitBucket, and at some point I considered using GitLab, too. However, the popularity of GitHub and its ecosystem made it hard to ignore. I even use GitHub to follow trends in my profession. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Facilitated Collaboration and Funding: With easier identification comes better connectivity. Contributors, partners, and funders can more readily find projects that resonate with their interests and values. Moreover, platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket are increasingly interested in integrating standardized licensing solutions like License-Token, paving the way for broader adoption and collaborative... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Hi! I made a small tool to open test coverage uploaded to Codecov[1] in a web browser with a few helpful flags: - branch: A target branch - path: The specific file - remote: An upstream Frequent clicks through the same paths and manual changes to the URL was a solid motivation for me. Learning more about Zig was a nice happening too. Not sponsored but that'd be cool ;) [1]: https://about.codecov.io. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
First of all, we need to have a repository. You can use different services, but I will show you on GitHub. First, you will need to go to the site and register in a way convenient for you. After that, you will see a personal account like this:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
If you're actively testing your codebase, which I hope you are, consider integrating a code coverage automatic checker such as codecov. This tool can alert if the coverage drops below a threshold. While I've had positive experiences with such tools, it's worth mentioning that the adoption process may pose some challenges. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The code coverage is printed out in the Coverage Report step but it is useful to track code coverage over time and have a repository badge which shows the current coverage percentage. There are many different code coverage and testing applications but we will use CodeCov. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Usually, you can't build a product without using various tools. Some of them can be free, and some of them can be commercial. The great benefit of working on Open Source projects is that a lot of companies with commercial products have special offers for non-commercial development. In the case of the "xq" utility, which is written in Go, I use GoLand IDE by JetBrains. I paid for it for several months but later... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
SourceForge - The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.
Coveralls - Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.