Been Together VS Digraph.dev

• Relationship Tracking
  Been Together allows users to track the duration of their relationships by counting the number of days since the relationship started. This can be a meaningful feature for those who enjoy celebrating milestones and anniversaries.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The app offers a simple and user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to input the start date of their relationship and view the count of days together.
• Customization Options
  Users can customize the app with different themes and backgrounds, allowing for a personalized experience that matches the user’s preferences.
• Widget Support
  Been Together offers home screen widgets, enabling users to have quick access to their relationship count without needing to open the app.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  The app is primarily focused on counting days, which may not be appealing to users seeking a comprehensive relationship management tool with additional features such as journaling or event reminders.
• Potential for Negative Usage
  In some cases, individuals might feel pressured by constantly tracking days in a relationship, especially if the relationship is experiencing difficulties, making it less ideal for everyone.
• Privacy Concerns
  Users need to be aware of what personal data is required and how it is managed, as with any app that involves personal and potentially sensitive information.
• Platform Limitations
  Been Together may not support all device types or operating systems, potentially limiting accessibility for some users who want to use it cross-platform.

• Developer-focused positioning
  The .dev domain and branding suggest a tool built for developers and technical teams, so its workflows are likely to fit engineering needs better than a generic product. I could not browse the site, so this is inferred from its positioning rather than confirmed.
• Graph-based approach
  The name 'Digraph' (directed graph) suggests it models information as connected nodes and relationships. That kind of structure can make dependencies, ideas, or decisions easier to see than flat lists or documents. Confirm how the product actually uses this.
• Modern, minimal presentation
  Newer developer tools tend to have lean interfaces and a focused feature set, which can mean a short learning curve and less clutter. I could not verify this for Digraph, so check it with a trial.
• Potential for better organization and clarity
  If the tool works as the name suggests, visualizing relationships between items can improve shared understanding across a team. The benefit depends on how well the product is executed.
• Early-stage responsiveness
  Smaller or newer products often respond quickly to user feedback and let users influence the roadmap. This is a general tendency and has not been verified for Digraph.