Bedrock VS Ember-cli

• Improved Project Structure
  Bedrock provides a more modern and organized project structure for WordPress projects, which makes it easier to manage and maintain codebases.
• Dependency Management with Composer
  It utilizes Composer for dependency management, allowing for better control over project dependencies and updates, similar to other modern PHP applications.
• Environment Configuration
  Bedrock allows for easy environment-specific configuration through the use of environment variables, simplifying deployment and configuration management.
• Enhanced Security
  The folder structure and configuration provided by Bedrock help in improving security by moving configuration files outside of the web root and using environment variables.
• Modern Development Practices
  It encourages developers to follow modern development practices, such as using version control, automation, and dependency management, which can improve overall code quality.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For developers not familiar with Composer or modern PHP development tools, the initial learning curve can be steep.
• Compatibility Issues
  Some WordPress plugins or themes might not fully support Bedrock's structure without modifications, which can lead to compatibility issues.
• Increased Complexity
  For small projects or simple sites, the additional complexity introduced by Bedrock may not be necessary and could complicate development.
• Hosting Considerations
  Not all shared hosting environments support the requirements needed to run Bedrock, which might limit hosting options or necessitate more advanced configurations.
• Community Support
  While Bedrock has an active community, it is not as large as the broader WordPress community, which might affect the availability of resources and tutorials.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

No analysis of Bedrock yet.

Why Switch From Java To Bedrock?

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• WordPress and Components

  As opposed to traditional WordPress setups, Composer treats WP core as a site’s dependency and not as the site itself, that’s why it installs it in a sub-directory. To make it easier to completely manage WordPress with Composer, several... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• WordPress Core to start using SQLite Database

  I really wish Wordpress would ditch the shared-hosting first deployment model and grow up a bit. Thankfully https://roots.io/bedrock/ exists to bridge the gap if you're absolutely forced to use WP. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• How do you create WordPress websites for your clients?

  There are ready-made boilerplates like Bedrock and Sword but, at an architectural level, I'm not a fan of any I've seen. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago