
Moqups
Invision
Axure
Figma
Proto.io
Zeplin
ProtoPie
Balsamiq. Rapid, effective and fun wireframing software.

Substack
Formo.so
Advanced analytics for Substack writers. Runs 100% locally, no cloud, no subscription. Discover your superfans, churn risk, and cohort retention.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Balsamiq seems to be a lot more popular than StackStats.app. While we know about 33 links to Balsamiq, we've tracked only 1 mention of StackStats.app.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | balsamiq.com | stackstats.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States | Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Balsamiq yet.
StackStats is a local desktop app for serious Substack writers. Import your CSV exports and get analytics Substack doesn't show you: bot-filtered open rates, cohort retention, dead subscriber detection, superfan ID, content-to-growth correlation, and an optional AI layer (supports Ollama,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Balsamiq yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
UX Review: Balsamiq.com - Watch a Usability Expert Review Our Site!
More videos
No StackStats.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Balsamiq and StackStats.app.
StackStats.app's answer:
I built StackStats because Substack's native analytics weren't cutting it. I wanted cohort data, real open rates (not bot-inflated), and a way to identify which posts were actually driving subscriber growth — but every tool I found was either cloud-based or required migrating off Substack entirely. So I built a local app that works with Substack's own CSV exports. No migration, no cloud, no subscription.
StackStats.app's answer:
StackStats runs 100% locally on your machine — your subscriber data never touches a server. It also goes far beyond what Substack shows natively: bot-filtered open rates, cohort retention, superfan identification, dead subscriber detection, and content-to-growth correlation. No subscription, no account, no cloud. Pay once, own it forever.
StackStats.app's answer:
Most newsletter analytics tools are cloud-based SaaS with monthly subscriptions. StackStats is a one-time purchase that runs entirely on your device. For Substack writers who care about privacy — especially those with paid subscribers — that's a meaningful difference. You also get analytics features that don't exist anywhere else, like bot-filtered open rates and cohort retention, without having to migrate away from Substack.
StackStats.app's answer:
Serious Substack writers who are frustrated by Substack's shallow native analytics and want real data to drive growth — without moving their subscriber data to the cloud.
StackStats.app's answer:
Electron (macOS + Windows), HTML/CSS/JavaScript, Chart.js, PapaParse. Optional AI layer supports Ollama, Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Groq, and OpenRouter. Licensing via Cloudflare Workers + D1. Payments via Gumroad.
Share your experience with using Balsamiq and StackStats.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Balsamiq is a design tool that has been available since 2008. It’s easy to use and even boasts active customer service if you need help. The software is beginner-friendly, so there is no learning curve if you’re a...
We have no reviews of StackStats.app yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Balsamiq is famously, deliberately low-fidelity. Everything looks like a napkin drawing, which is the point, because nobody argues about font choices when the mockup is gray boxes. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Usually my own way of working is to use Balsamiq[0] to have a visual prototype to test out flows, Figma|Sketch for the UI specs, then to just code it. Kinda the same when drawing where you just doodle until you have a few workable ideas,... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
You can still produce something useful even if you’re not a professional designer. For example, you can use a rapid wireframing tool like Balsamiq (my favorite) or Excalidraw. With such tools, you can sketch an idea quickly without... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
I'm working on 3 products now: 1. FormBeep(https://formbeep.com) at $38 MRR now - A form to Whatsapp tool. Stack is mainly CF workers with Clerk Auth. 2. SlashLink(https://slashlink.app) $0 - A simple pay as you go amazon link localizer.... - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
When comparing Balsamiq and StackStats.app, you can also consider the following products.

The most stunning HTML5 app for creating resolution-independent SVG mockups, wireframes & interactive prototypes for your next project
Compare Moqups to Balsamiq or StackStats.app:

With Substack, anyone can start a publication that combines a personal website, blog, and email newsletter or podcast. It's quick and simple.
Compare Substack to Balsamiq or StackStats.app:

Prototyping and collaboration for design teams
Compare Invision to Balsamiq or StackStats.app:


The most powerful way to plan, prototype and hand off to developers, all without code. Download a free trial and see why professionals choose Axure RP 9.
Compare Axure to Balsamiq or StackStats.app:

Team-based interface design, Figma lets you collaborate on designs in real time.
Compare Figma to Balsamiq or StackStats.app: