Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Blob Storage VS Apache Parquet

Compare Azure Blob Storage VS Apache Parquet and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Azure Blob Storage logo Azure Blob Storage

Use Azure Blob Storage to store all kinds of files. Azure hot, cool, and archive storage is reliable cloud object storage for unstructured data

Apache Parquet logo Apache Parquet

Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem.
  • Azure Blob Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-01
  • Apache Parquet Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-17

Azure Blob Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Blob Storage automatically scales to handle large amounts of data, enabling you to grow your storage needs without worrying about performance constraints.
  • Durability
    Azure offers high durability with multiple redundant copies of your data, ensuring that your information is safeguarded against hardware failures.
  • Cost Effectiveness
    Different tiers of storage (Hot, Cool, Archive) allow you to optimize costs based on how frequently you need to access your data.
  • Security
    Robust security features, including encryption at rest and in transit, as well as advanced threat protection, keep your data secure.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with Azure's ecosystem and other services, such as Azure Functions, Azure Data Factory, and more, for extended functionality.
  • Global Reach
    Data centers available globally ensure lower latency and compliance with local data residency requirements.
  • Automation
    Supports automation through REST APIs, SDKs, and Azure CLI, making it easier to manage and scale your storage programmatically.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Blob Storage

  • Complex Pricing
    The tiered pricing model can be complex, making it challenging to estimate costs accurately, particularly if your usage patterns vary.
  • Performance Variability
    Performance can vary based on the tier selected, and selecting the wrong tier might result in slower access speeds for your data.
  • Data Transfer Costs
    Ingress is free, but data egress and data transfer between regions incur additional costs, which can add up if your application moves a lot of data.
  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, the range of features and different settings can make it complex to get started, especially for organizations new to Azure.
  • Latency
    Although Azure data centers are globally distributed, there can still be some latency issues depending on your geographic location relative to the data center.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using Azure-specific APIs and integrations can create a dependency on Microsoft's ecosystem, making it difficult to switch providers in the future.

Apache Parquet features and specs

  • Columnar Storage
    Apache Parquet uses columnar storage, which allows for efficient retrieval of only the data you need, reducing I/O and improving query performance on large datasets.
  • Compression
    Parquet files support efficient compression and encoding schemes, resulting in significant storage savings and less data to transfer over the network.
  • Compatibility
    It is compatible with the Hadoop ecosystem, including tools like Apache Spark, Hive, and Impala, making it versatile for big data processing.
  • Schema Evolution
    Parquet supports schema evolution, allowing changes to the schema without breaking existing data, which helps in maintaining long-lived data pipelines.
  • Efficient Read Performance for Aggregations
    Due to its columnar layout, Parquet is highly efficient for processing queries that aggregate data across columns, such as SUM and AVERAGE.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Parquet

  • Write Performance
    Writing data to Parquet can be slower compared to row-based formats, particularly for small inserts or updates, due to the overhead of encoding and compression.
  • Complexity in File Management
    Managing and partitioning Parquet files to optimize performance can become complex, particularly as datasets grow in size and complexity.
  • Not Ideal for All Workloads
    Workloads that require frequent row-level updates or involve small queries might be less efficient with Parquet due to its columnar nature.
  • Learning Curve
    The need to understand the nuances of columnar storage, encoding, and compression can pose a learning curve for teams new to Parquet.

Analysis of Azure Blob Storage

Overall verdict

  • Azure Blob Storage is generally a good choice for businesses and developers looking for a reliable and versatile cloud storage solution. Its comprehensive feature set, global reach, and integration capabilities make it well-suited for various storage requirements.

Why this product is good

  • Azure Blob Storage is considered good due to its scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. It offers robust data redundancy options, integrates well with other Azure services, and provides strong security features like encryption and role-based access control. Additionally, it supports a wide array of data types and is suitable for storing large amounts of unstructured data, making it an ideal choice for cloud storage needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers building cloud-native applications
  • Businesses needing to store large volumes of unstructured data
  • Organizations requiring integration with other Azure services
  • Enterprises looking for flexible pricing and abundant storage options
  • Users needing advanced security and compliance features

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Blob Storage and Apache Parquet)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Big Data
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Blob Storage and Apache Parquet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Azure Blob Storage and Apache Parquet

Azure Blob Storage Reviews

7 Best Amazon S3 Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
If youโ€™re looking to move completely away from any of the big three cloud storage providers (AWS, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage), Digital Ocean Spaces is a potential option worth looking into.

Apache Parquet Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Parquet yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Parquet should be more popular than Azure Blob Storage. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Blob Storage mentions (15)

View more

Apache Parquet mentions (25)

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ Simulating Course Schedules 600x Faster with Web Workers in CourseCast
    If there was a way to package and compress the Excel spreadsheet in a web-friendly format, then there's nothing stopping us from loading the entire dataset in the browser!1 Sure enough, the Parquet file format was specifically designed for efficient portability. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Pitch Your Boss to Adopt Apache Iceberg?
    Iceberg decouples storage from compute. That means your data isnโ€™t trapped inside one proprietary system. Instead, it lives in open file formats (like Apache Parquet) and is managed by an open, vendor-neutral metadata layer (Apache Iceberg). - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Processing data with โ€œData Prep Kitโ€ (part 2)
    Data prep kit github repository: https://github.com/data-prep-kit/data-prep-kit?tab=readme-ov-file Quick start guide: https://github.com/data-prep-kit/data-prep-kit/blob/dev/doc/quick-start/contribute-your-own-transform.md Provided samples and examples: https://github.com/data-prep-kit/data-prep-kit/tree/dev/examples Parquet: https://parquet.apache.org/. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • ๐Ÿ”ฌPublic docker images Trivy scans as duckdb datas on Kaggle
    Deliver nice ready-to-use data as duckdb, parquet and csv. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Introducing Promptwright: Synthetic Dataset Generation with Local LLMs
    Push the dataset to hugging face in parquet format. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Blob Storage and Apache Parquet, you can also consider the following products

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Apache Arrow - Apache Arrow is a cross-language development platform for in-memory data.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Apache Spark - Apache Spark is an engine for big data processing, with built-in modules for streaming, SQL, machine learning and graph processing.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

DuckDB - DuckDB is an in-process SQL OLAP database management system