Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Archive Storage VS Google Persistent Disk

Compare Azure Archive Storage VS Google Persistent Disk and see what are their differences

Azure Archive Storage logo Azure Archive Storage

Low cost, secure cloud storage for rarely accessed data.

Google Persistent Disk logo Google Persistent Disk

Google Persistent Disk is a high performance block storage for the Google Cloud Platform.
  • Azure Archive Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11
  • Google Persistent Disk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27

Azure Archive Storage features and specs

  • Cost-Effective
    Azure Archive Storage offers a low-cost solution for storing large amounts of data that are infrequently accessed, making it ideal for long-term retention and archival storage.
  • High Durability
    The service provides high durability with data stored redundantly across multiple facilities, ensuring the data's safety and long-term availability.
  • Security Features
    It includes robust security features such as encryption at rest and advanced access controls, which help protect sensitive data stored in the archive.
  • Seamless Integration
    Azure Archive Storage integrates well with other Azure services, providing a streamlined experience for users already within the Azure ecosystem.
  • Compliance Support
    Azure Archive Storage supports various compliance certifications, aiding businesses in adhering to regulatory requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Archive Storage

  • High Latency
    Data retrieval from Azure Archive Storage has high latency due to its design for infrequent access, which might not be suitable for time-sensitive data recovery needs.
  • Retrieval Costs
    While storage costs are low, data retrieval from the archive incurs additional fees, which can add up if frequent access is necessary.
  • Complex Management
    Managing lifecycle and access policies for archived data can be complex and may require additional oversight or advanced management tools.
  • Limited Access Methods
    The service primarily supports blob storage with limited access methods, which could limit flexibility for certain types of applications needing more direct data access.
  • Latency in Data Transitions
    Transitioning data between different storage tiers (like from Cold to Archive and vice-versa) can add latency, which might not align with all business usage scenarios.

Google Persistent Disk features and specs

  • High Durability
    Google Persistent Disk offers reliable storage with redundancy across multiple disks, ensuring data durability and reducing the risk of data loss.
  • Automatic Backups
    Supports automated snapshots for easy backup and recovery, allowing you to restore data to any point in time.
  • Scalability
    Easily scalable to accommodate growing storage needs. You can increase your storage capacity without downtime.
  • Integration with Google Cloud
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services for efficient management and utilization within the cloud ecosystem.
  • Performance
    Provides persistent, high-performance block storage suitable for a wide range of applications, including databases and high-traffic websites.

Possible disadvantages of Google Persistent Disk

  • Cost
    Pricing can become expensive, especially with large data sets or high IOPS requirements, compared to some other storage options.
  • Zonal Availability
    Dependent on the geographical location of the data center and may require particular configurations for applications needing multi-region failover support.
  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring persistent disks might be complex for users unfamiliar with Google Cloud's interface and services.
  • Performance Limits
    Though performance is generally high, it may have limitations, such as maximum IOPS and throughput, depending on the disk type and size.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Archive Storage and Google Persistent Disk)
Cloud Storage
55 55%
45% 45
Cloud Computing
55 55%
45% 45
Object Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Archive Storage and Google Persistent Disk. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Archive Storage should be more popular than Google Persistent Disk. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Archive Storage mentions (4)

  • Azure Fundamentals: Microsoft.Storage
    Ready to get started? Explore the Azure Storage documentation and begin building your cloud storage solutions today: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • best practice and cheapest way to store or archive big amounts of data
    This! Glacier is very cheap and is a great option to store archival data. OP should be aware that it would take a while to retrieve data if needed. As mentioned, Azure Archive Storage is a nice option as well. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Best cloud storage for reasonable price
    Cheaper than that would be Azure Archive or AWS Glacier since their storage costs $0.00099 per month for 1GB, but it takes a while to retrieve data back. If you need a long-term archival for cheap, their archive storage is worth your considerations. Https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/archive/ Https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Top 30 Microsoft Azure Services
    If you're deploying applications to the cloud, you'll need persistent data storage. Azure Blob Storage allows scalable storage for objects and files and provides an SDK to easily access them. Blob storage is a great trigger for Azure Functions, where uploading a file can automatically run your custom logic in the cloud (for example, if you wanted to run OCR on a file as soon as it's uploaded to a storage... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Google Persistent Disk mentions (2)

  • SSDs Have Become Fast, Except in the Cloud
    This is untrue of Local SSD (https://cloud.google.com/local-ssd) in Google Cloud. Local SSDs are PCIe peripherals. There are also multiple Persistent Disk (https://cloud.google.com/persistent-disk) offerings that are backed by SSDs over the network. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • All your notes are stored in an open, unsecure, and unencryped format on the Remarkable cloud. Just so you know.
    Google uses several layers of encryption to protect customer data at rest. All customer content stored at rest is encrypted, without any action required from the customer, using one or more encryption mechanisms. All data stored in Google Cloud is encrypted at the storage level using AES256, with the exception of a small number of Persistent Disks created before 2015 that use AES128. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Archive Storage and Google Persistent Disk, you can also consider the following products

Amazon Glacier - Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost storage service for data archiving and long-term backup.

Pure Storage - Pure Storage is an all-flash enterprise storage solution that accelerate random I/O-intensive applications like server virtualization, deskt

Public Cloud Archive - Learn about cloud archiving, the difference between hybrid and full-service cloud archive offerings, and the key cloud archive vendors and offerings in the market today.

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Global Relay - Global Relay is the leading provider of cloud-based electronic message archiving, supervision, and...

Nimble Storage - Nimble Storage provides storage infrastructure combined with predictive analytics.