AxSoft VS Quill

Compare AxSoft VS Quill and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX

The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

AxSoft

WYSIWYG equation editor for Word and LaTeX.

Quill

Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Landing page //
2021-09-20

Landing page //
2018-10-20

AxSoft

Website: axsoft.co
$ Details: -

Edit details

Quill

Website: quilljs.com
$ Details

Edit details

AxSoft features and specs

User-Friendly Interface
AxSoft offers a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Comprehensive Features
The platform provides a wide range of tools and features that cater to different business needs, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
Customer Support
AxSoft is known for its responsive and helpful customer service team, which assists users with technical issues and inquiries promptly.
Customization
The software allows for a high degree of customization to suit specific business requirements, providing flexibility for users.

Possible disadvantages of AxSoft

Cost
Some users find the pricing of AxSoft products to be on the higher side, which might be a concern for smaller businesses or startups.
Learning Curve
Despite its user-friendly design, there can be an initial learning curve for users unfamiliar with similar software platforms.
Limited Integration
AxSoft may have limited integration capabilities with certain third-party applications, which can restrict seamless workflow for some users.
Performance Issues
Occasional reports of software lags or performance issues, particularly when handling large volumes of data.

Quill features and specs

User-friendly Interface
Quill offers a highly intuitive interface that’s easy for users to navigate, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
Rich Text Editing
Quill supports rich text editing, allowing formatting, embedding media, and even custom operations through an extensive API.
Customizability
Developers can customize the editor through themes, modules, and configurations, enabling a wide range of tailored implementations.
Open Source
Quill is open source, allowing developers to contribute to its development, inspect the code, and ensure it aligns with their security standards.
Modular Architecture
Its modular architecture lets developers include only the features they need, optimizing performance and user experience.
Active Community and Support
Quill has an active community, providing extensive documentation, examples, and community support which makes it easier to troubleshoot issues and integrate the editor.

Possible disadvantages of Quill

Complex Customization
While Quill is customizable, achieving advanced or very specific customizations can sometimes be complex and time-consuming, requiring in-depth knowledge of its API.
Performance Issues
In some cases, especially with large documents or a high number of embedded elements, users may experience performance lags or slower response times.
Limited Built-in Features
Out of the box, Quill provides a limited set of features compared to some other rich text editors. Additional features often require custom modules or extensions.
Lack of Some Advanced Features
Certain advanced editing features like track changes and version history are not natively supported and need to be implemented separately.
Browser Compatibility
Although Quill supports modern browsers, there may be some inconsistencies or issues in rendering across different browsers and devices, necessitating additional testing and adjustments.
Learning Curve for Developers
New developers may face a steep learning curve when trying to understand and utilize Quill’s API and functionality fully.

Analysis of Quill

Overall verdict

Overall, Quill is a highly recommended rich text editor for web applications due to its flexibility, ease of use, and active development community.

Why this product is good

Quill is considered a good choice for a rich text editor because it is lightweight, highly customizable, and easy to integrate. It provides a modern and clean user interface, supports a wide range of features such as themes and modules, and offers excellent performance. Quill's community and comprehensive documentation also make it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

Recommended for

Developers looking for a lightweight and customizable rich text editor.
Projects requiring a straightforward integration process.
Applications needing extendable functionality through modules and themes.
Environments that prioritize performance and a modern UI.

AxSoft videos

+ Add

Writing a math equation using Axmath software

Quill videos

+ Add

Fransesco Rubinato Quill Pen Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AxSoft and Quill)

AxSoft

Quill

Text Editors

15 15%

Text Editors

85% 85

Rich Text Editor

11 11%

Rich Text Editor

89% 89

IDEs And Text Editors

18 18%

IDEs And Text Editors

82% 82

Web App

100 100%

Web App

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AxSoft and Quill. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AxSoft and Quill

AxSoft Reviews

We have no reviews of AxSoft yet.
Be the first one to post

Quill Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors

If you are looking for a polished free, open-source WYSIWYG editor with no premium frills, Quill (or Quilljs) should be the perfect text editor. It is a lightweight editor with a minimal user interface that allows you to customize or add your extensions to scale their functionalities per your requirements.

Source: itsfoss.com

Looking for a CKEditor? Try these 10 Alternatives

Quill is a lightweight and modular WYSIWYG editor that supports a range of formatting options and features. Its minimalist design makes it a great choice for those who want a simple editor that’s easy to use.

Source: blog.hubspot.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Quill seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AxSoft mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AxSoft yet. Tracking of AxSoft recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Quill mentions (36)

Tool of the week: Free WYSIWYG Editor with QuillJS
I’ve put together a simple but powerful online WYSIWYG editor powered by QuillJS. It’s designed for developers, bloggers, and content managers who want to quickly create and format HTML without writing raw code. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
Few things to know
Few alternatives in the category of text editors, Tiptap, Editorjs, Lexical and Quill. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Let's Develop a Fullstack Blogging CMS from Scratch using React.js and Node.js
Create a new article page - will use "Quill Editor" for example, it will give us the possibility to work (create, update) with each article;. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Ask HN: How to integrate a Blog system into my NextJS app
> One thing I learned is that you should lean towards letting non-technical people choose their own tools like why we largely let developers choose their own tools. IMHO: I think a more sustainable variant of this (for your own sanity) might be to ask them which tool(s) they like and then take some time to understand WHY. But then instead of just letting them use those directly, you would either vet them first... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
SLATE Code editor with highlight
SLATE is an excellent library for creating WYSIWYG editors in REACT, I find it superior to QUILL. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago