AxSoft VS MathLive.js

Compare AxSoft VS MathLive.js and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX

The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured

Not enough products to filter down. Redirecting to the primary Website Testing.

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

AxSoft

WYSIWYG equation editor for Word and LaTeX.

MathLive.js

TeX is the gold standard for typesetting of mathematical content.

Landing page //
2021-09-20

Landing page //
2023-03-05

AxSoft

Website: axsoft.co
$ Details: -

Edit details

MathLive.js

Website: mathlive.io
$ Details

Edit details

AxSoft features and specs

User-Friendly Interface
AxSoft offers a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Comprehensive Features
The platform provides a wide range of tools and features that cater to different business needs, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
Customer Support
AxSoft is known for its responsive and helpful customer service team, which assists users with technical issues and inquiries promptly.
Customization
The software allows for a high degree of customization to suit specific business requirements, providing flexibility for users.

Possible disadvantages of AxSoft

Cost
Some users find the pricing of AxSoft products to be on the higher side, which might be a concern for smaller businesses or startups.
Learning Curve
Despite its user-friendly design, there can be an initial learning curve for users unfamiliar with similar software platforms.
Limited Integration
AxSoft may have limited integration capabilities with certain third-party applications, which can restrict seamless workflow for some users.
Performance Issues
Occasional reports of software lags or performance issues, particularly when handling large volumes of data.

MathLive.js features and specs

Interactive Math Input
MathLive.js provides an interactive interface that allows users to input mathematical expressions easily, supporting a range of operations including fractions, exponents, and more.
LaTeX Support
It offers excellent support for LaTeX, making it easy for users familiar with this format to input and render complex mathematical expressions.
Customization
MathLive.js is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the look, feel, and functionality of the math input fields to suit their specific needs.
Accessibility
The library is designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring that mathematical content can be navigated and used by people with disabilities.
Cross-Platform Compatibility
MathLive.js works across various browsers and devices, providing a consistent experience for users regardless of their platform.

Possible disadvantages of MathLive.js

Complexity for Beginners
For developers not familiar with LaTeX or math libraries, the setup and use of MathLive.js can be complex and daunting.
Performance Concerns
Rendering and manipulating complex mathematical expressions may lead to performance issues, particularly on older devices or with large datasets.
Limited Built-in Symbols
While MathLive.js supports a wide range of symbols, not all mathematical symbols and operations may be available out of the box, requiring additional customization or extensions.
Dependency Management
Incorporating MathLive.js into a project introduces additional dependencies that need to be managed and updated, which can be a challenge in larger projects.
Learning Curve
There is a learning curve associated with understanding and effectively using the library, which may require additional time and resources to overcome.

AxSoft videos

+ Add

Writing a math equation using Axmath software

MathLive.js videos

No MathLive.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AxSoft and MathLive.js)

AxSoft

MathLive.js

Text Editors

57 57%

Text Editors

43% 43

Rich Text Editor

43 43%

Rich Text Editor

57% 57

IDEs And Text Editors

40 40%

IDEs And Text Editors

60% 60

Web App

53 53%

Web App

47% 47

User comments

Share your experience with using AxSoft and MathLive.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MathLive.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AxSoft mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AxSoft yet. Tracking of AxSoft recommendations started around Mar 2021.

MathLive.js mentions (3)

Show HN: I built a math website the internet loved, I'm back with more features
Also consider https://cortexjs.io/mathlive/ in case you need LaTeX WYSIWYG ordinary people can understand. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Math Editor Upgrade and New Features for More Compact Sheets
Up until this time, EngineeringPaper.xyz has been using the MathQuill math editor component. This editor worked well but is no longer being actively developed and has some limitations that have limited what features can be implemented in EngineeringPaper.xyz. Specifically, MathQuill does not support vectors and matrices. To enable the future advancement of EngineeringPaper.xyz, the math editor has been updated to... Source: over 2 years ago
I build a formula expression recognition tool myself, hope to get advice~
Maybe you could consider having an editable mathfield so the result can be easily tweaked if needed. I'd recommend https://cortexjs.io/mathlive/ but I'm biased, I'm the author of that library :). Source: almost 3 years ago