
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon S3
Google App Engine
DynamoDB
Google Cloud Functions
Amazon AWS
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Automatic, event-driven compute service

Wiz
Orca
Orca Scan
Palo Alto Prisma Cloud
Microsoft Defender
Lacework
Sysdig
Unified CNAPP platform: CSPM, CIEM, DSPM, CWPP, SSPM, agentless workload scanning, attack paths, threat detection & compliance across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Alibaba, IBM, Kubernetes and SaaS. 100% agentless.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, AWS Lambda seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 297 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | aws.amazon.com | onamsecurity.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from India · 1 - 9 employees · 2022 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of AWS Lambda yet.
Onam Security is a unified cloud security platform — CSPM, CNAPP and SSPM on a single security graph instead of six stitched-together products. One deployment covers posture management, attack-path analysis, identity and entitlements (CIEM), data security posture, container and Kubernetes...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Onam Security yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
AWS Lambda Vs EC2 | Serverless Vs EC2 | EC2 Alternatives
More videos
SaaS Security Posture Management: Why Your CSPM Stops at the Cloud Account
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing AWS Lambda and Onam Security.
Onam Security's answer:
One security graph, not a suite. Most "unified" platforms are acquisitions stitched behind a single login — separate data models, separate consoles, findings that never meet. Onam was built from one inventory and one rule model, so connecting a single cloud account activates every capability at once: posture, attack paths, identity, data, containers, SaaS and detection. That design produces things a stitched suite structurally cannot. SaaS posture sits on the same graph as cloud posture, so a Google Workspace admin without MFA and an over-permissive IAM role can be scored as hops on one attack path. And coverage goes deep where others go wide — 11,346 posture rules across 549 services on seven clouds, including OCI, Alibaba Cloud and IBM Cloud, which most competitors treat as a checkbox.
Onam Security's answer:
Three reasons. First, consolidation that is real: one agentless connection replaces six tools and five dashboards, and there is nothing to install — read-only credentials, no sidecars, no daemons on your nodes. Second, prioritisation you can act on. Attack-path analysis cuts thousands of findings to the handful an attacker could actually chain, each mapped to MITRE ATT&CK with hops-to-breach and blast radius, and risk is expressed in dollars via the FAIR model rather than another severity label. Third, breadth without shallowness: 78 compliance frameworks from a single control set, 7 clouds and 8 SaaS platforms on one graph, and rules defined in versioned YAML rather than hardcoded — so coverage is auditable and extensible instead of a marketing number.
Onam Security's answer:
Small and mid-sized security teams carrying enterprise-sized cloud estates. The typical user is a cloud security engineer, security architect or head of security at an organisation running two or more clouds plus a heavy SaaS footprint, responsible for thousands of assets with a team of two to twenty people. They are the teams for whom the six-product approach never worked — not because they could not buy the tools, but because nobody had the headcount to wire them together and triage five queues. Compliance leads are a strong secondary audience, particularly at organisations under multiple overlapping regimes that need one control set to answer to all of them.
Onam Security's answer:
Onam was built by people who have run incident response, threat hunts and cloud architecture reviews — not by a marketing team that later hired security. The frustration that started it was specific: paying for six products, wiring five dashboards, and still missing the finding that mattered. The conclusion was that fragmentation is not a UI problem to be solved with another dashboard; it is a data-model problem. Findings cannot be correlated if each product holds its own inventory in its own schema. So Onam started at the other end — one inventory, one rule model, one graph — and built the capabilities on top of that rather than bolting them together afterwards.
Onam Security's answer:
Python and FastAPI power the backend, with a single backend-for-frontend gateway exposing roughly 166 endpoints across 60 routers, plus Pydantic for validation and SQLAlchemy over PostgreSQL for the inventory and findings data model. Attack-path analysis runs on a Neo4j property graph, per tenant, with roughly 25 catalog-driven edge derivers. All 11,346 posture rules are defined in human-readable YAML and versioned in a catalog — the platform loads and evaluates rules, never hardcodes them. Cloud collection uses provider SDKs and read-only APIs: the AWS SDK, Azure Management API, GCP Cloud Asset API and equivalents. The console is TypeScript, React and Next.js with Tailwind CSS. The platform runs as multi-tenant SaaS.
Share your experience with using AWS Lambda and Onam Security. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


AWS Lambda is suitable for applications with varying workloads and those already using the AWS ecosystem.
We have no reviews of Onam Security yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


AWS Lambda is a service that runs your code without you managing any servers. You write your code, deploy it to Lambda, and it takes care of the infrastructure — servers, networking, security, and scaling. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Clay can replace the Lambda and API chain if you'd rather avoid custom code. You set up a Clay table as the enrichment layer, trigger it from Segment via webhook, and it handles the waterfall and CRM push without writing a function. The... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
To show why this matters, take a look at the following example. I have three AWS Lambda functions, Lambda being the serverless compute service, that each handle a different endpoint on the same API. But, almost everything about them is... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Tracking Onam Security since Aug 2026.
When comparing AWS Lambda and Onam Security, you can also consider the following products.

Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale
Compare Amazon API Gateway to AWS Lambda or Onam Security:

The leading cloud infrastructure security platform that enables organizations to rapidly identify and remove the most pressing risks in the cloud.
Compare Wiz to AWS Lambda or Onam Security:

Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.
Compare Amazon S3 to AWS Lambda or Onam Security:
Orca.exe is a database table editor for creating and editing Windows Installer packages and merge...
Compare Orca to AWS Lambda or Onam Security:

A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.
Compare Google App Engine to AWS Lambda or Onam Security:

No-Code Barcode Tracking: Effortlessly create, print, and scan barcodes from any device. Simplify asset and inventory management with real-time data and seamless integrations—no technical expertise required.
Compare Orca Scan to AWS Lambda or Onam Security: