Based on our record, Amazon CloudFront should be more popular than AWS Batch. It has been mentiond 82 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Compute: This is the big one. It's the cost of running EC2 instances with GPUs (like the g5 or p4 series) for model training and deployment. It also includes the compute for services like Amazon SageMaker and AWS Batch. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
After moving off Jenkins, I moved everything to AWS Batch with Fargate. This works quite well, but it is proving to be a little expensive, as I have to pay for:. Source: over 2 years ago
If you're looking for more control over your infrastructure and want to run a full computing environment, EC2 might be the right choice for you. With EC2, you have complete control over the operating system, network, and storage, which can be useful if you need to install custom software or use specific hardware configurations. Additionally, EC2 + Batch processing provide a wider range of instance types, including... Source: over 2 years ago
AWS Batch is the equivalent of a university cluster you submit to with slurm/sge/lsf/etc. But does not use those schedulers as AWS has their own. Source: over 2 years ago
Developers frequently use batch computing to access significant amounts of processing power. You may perform batch computing workloads in the AWS Cloud with the aid of AWS Batch, a fully managed service provided by AWS. It is a powerful solution that can plan, schedule, and execute containerized batch or machine learning workloads across the entire spectrum of AWS compute capabilities, including Amazon ECS, Amazon... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The Event Resources Website project help me solve common event management challenges. This customizable static website runs on Amazon S3 and Amazon CloudFront, providing a professional platform to share event resources with attendees. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
So far our high level architecture diagram wasn't very impressive - we only used AWS Amplify service to host our web application. Of course there are many services under the hood like Route 53, CloudFront, Certificate Manager, Lambda and S3, but Amplify provides level of abstraction, so that we don't have to think about it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
To improve the performance of my resume website and enhance user experience, I set up Amazon CloudFront, AWSโs content delivery network. CloudFront caches my websiteโs static content closer to users around the world, leading to faster load times and a more responsive site. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Offload static files (images, CSS, JS) to a Content Delivery Network (CDN) like Cloudflare or AWS CloudFront. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
AWS CloudFront is the star of the show here. It caches static content (like media, scripts, and images) to ensure fast, reliable delivery. Other AWS services that run at the edge include Route 53 for DNS routing, Shield and WAF for security, and even Lambda via Lambda@Edge โ giving you the ability to run serverless logic closer to the user. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
APeX - Get your own corner of the Web for less! Register a new .COM for just $9.99 for the first year and get everything you need to make your mark online โ website builder, hosting, email, and more.
CloudFlare - Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.
AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service
KeyCDN - KeyCDN is a high-performance Content Delivery Network (CDN). Lowest price globally at $0.04/GB with HTTP/2 Support and free Origin Shield.
Google Cloud Run - Bringing serverless to containers
CDN77 - Content Delivery Network - website speed acceleration with CDN77. 28+ PoPs, Pay-as-you-go prices, no commitments.