Software Alternatives & Startups

Awesomic VS CloudLinux

Compare Awesomic VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

Awesomic

We match your business with a pro designer. You get daily design work done. $7 trial week. 24 Hour Turnaround. 10К successfully completed design tasks. 1000 businesses got Awesomic designs

CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Awesomic seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Design As A Service popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Awesomic
CloudLinux
Website awesomic.com cloudlinux.com
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

About Awesomic and CloudLinux

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Awesomic
CloudLinux

Quality. The designers at Awesomic are pre-selected based on experience and expertise criteria. Unqualified newbies simply have no way to join the team. Speed. You’ll get the first concepts from your designer in the first 24 hours since the start of the project. But the first updates will be...

Read more about Awesomic

No description of CloudLinux yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Awesomic 5 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • Subscription Model
    Awesomic offers a subscription-based model which can provide cost savings for businesses needing regular design work. It allows for flexible monthly payments instead of large, one-time fees.
  • Access to Diverse Talent
    Users gain access to a wide range of professional designers, each with various specialties and expertise, enabling businesses to find the right match for specific projects.
  • Quick Turnaround
    Awesomic promises prompt delivery of design projects, often within 24-48 hours, making it ideal for businesses with tight deadlines.
  • Quality Assurance
    Projects undergo a thorough review process to ensure high-quality outcomes, which can be particularly beneficial for businesses looking to maintain a professional standard.
  • Scalability
    Businesses can easily scale up or down their design needs based on project demands, thanks to the flexible subscription plans offered by Awesomic.

Possible disadvantages

  • Monthly Cost
    The subscription model, while flexible, may not be cost-effective for businesses with sporadic design needs, potentially leading to underutilization.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Relying on a third-party platform for design work can create dependency issues and may complicate direct communication with freelance designers.
  • Limited Personalization
    The quick turnaround and standardized processes might limit the level of personalization and deep customization possible for more complex or nuanced projects.
  • Variable Designer Experience
    While there is access to diverse talent, the experience and quality of individual designers can vary, potentially affecting the consistency of the final output.
  • Potential for Overload
    If the service becomes too popular, there is a risk that Awesomic could become overloaded with requests, potentially impacting delivery times and service quality.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Awesomic
CloudLinux

Overall verdict

  • Awesomic is generally considered a good service, especially for businesses and entrepreneurs seeking design solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Speed
    The platform is known for quick turnaround times, making it ideal for fast-paced projects.
  • Flexibility
    Awesomic allows clients to request various types of design work, ranging from logos to marketing materials.
  • Customer service
    Users often praise their responsive and helpful customer support team.
  • Cost effectiveness
    For many users, Awesomic provides a cost-effective solution compared to hiring full-time designers or going through design agencies.
  • Quality of designs
    Awesomic offers high-quality design services with a focus on creativity and efficiency.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses needing regular design updates.
  • Startups looking for branding and marketing materials.
  • Entrepreneurs who require quick design solutions without the overhead of hiring a full-time designer.
  • Marketing teams that need flexible and scalable design resources.

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Awesomic 1 video + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

Get Your Designer – Awesomic

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Awesomic
CloudLinux
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Awesomic and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Awesomic 5.0 · 2 reviews
CloudLinux no reviews yet
  • Rated 5/5 by Yuriy
    SaaSHub review
    · Aug 2022

    Hi, my name is Yurii. Pleased to meet you and allow me to leave a review in a few words: The Awesomic team, agreed to help me with the implementation of this project (on a volunteer basis and already the second month...

  • Really an amazing service so far!
    SaaSHub review
    · Aug 2022

    Really an amazing service so far! Awesomic is fast and stays in good communication daily and weekly! I am very pleased with Awesomic!

We have no reviews of CloudLinux yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Awesomic 2 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • I created my MVP. I've shown it to 2 customers. They are happy about it.
    We actually do something similar to awesomic.io, but are at an earlier stage in our business - so less expensive. If it turns out we're not a good fit, let me know and I can give some recommendations to other agencies. Source: about 4 years ago
  • I created my MVP. I've shown it to 2 customers. They are happy about it.
    I am currently looking to improve on UI design. Let me know if you are aware of any good agencies. I want to hire from awesomic.io, but currently, I'm out of budget. How about charging customers from the early adopter's program for some... Source: about 4 years ago

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Awesomic and CloudLinux

When comparing Awesomic and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.