Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

awesome VS QuickJS

Compare awesome VS QuickJS and see what are their differences

awesome

A dynamic window manager for the X Window System developed in the C and Lua programming languages.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
QuickJS

Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and JavaScript Compilers

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
ScreenSnap Pro
Stop sharing plain, boring screenshots. Add stunning backgrounds, pro annotations, and instant cloud links — all in one click. Pay once, own it forever. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, QuickJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 46 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 46
Window Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
173 vs 44

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

awesome
QuickJS
Website awesome.naquadah.org bellard.org
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in
Linux Window Manager Open Source Utilities +1
Design Tools Developers User Experience Application And Data +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

awesome 5 features
QuickJS 6 features
  • Highly Configurable
    Awesome is extremely configurable, allowing users to customize their environment to fit their specific workflow.
  • Lightweight
    As a tiling window manager, Awesome is very lightweight and consumes minimal resources, which is ideal for older hardware or minimal setups.
  • Lua Scripting
    Configuration is done through Lua scripting, which provides powerful and flexible customization options.
  • Tiling and Dynamic Layouts
    Awesome offers both tiling and floating window management with dynamic layouts that adjust based on user preference.
  • Active Community
    The Awesome community is active and supportive, providing ample documentation and user-contributed modules and configurations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive configurability and scripting-based setup, Awesome can be challenging for newcomers to get accustomed to.
  • Limited Graphical Configuration Tools
    Configuration is done mainly through text files and scripts, which can be daunting for users who prefer graphical interfaces.
  • Sparse Default Configuration
    The default configuration of Awesome is fairly minimal, requiring significant setup time to create a personalized environment.
  • Performance Overhead with Complex Scripts
    While Lua scripting is powerful, highly complex scripts can introduce performance overhead, potentially impacting the system's responsiveness.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Certain applications that are designed with floating window managers in mind may not function optimally with Awesome's tiling system.
  • Lightweight
    QuickJS is designed to be lightweight with a small footprint, making it easy to embed in applications and suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • Fast Startup Time
    QuickJS offers very fast startup times, which can be beneficial for applications that require quick script execution without a long initialization period.
  • Full ES2020 Support
    QuickJS supports the full ES2020 specification, providing modern JavaScript features and syntax, which is advantageous for developers who want to use the latest JavaScript features.
  • Embeddability
    Being easy to integrate into other applications or systems, QuickJS provides a simple C API, which facilitates embedding it in various software and platforms.
  • Single File Distribution
    QuickJS can be distributed as a single file, simplifying packaging and distribution without needing external dependencies.
  • Memory Efficiency
    Its memory efficient design allows QuickJS to run scripts in environments with limited memory resources, making it suitable for IoT devices and embedded systems.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Ecosystem
    QuickJS, being a relatively new and niche project, has a smaller ecosystem compared to more established JavaScript engines like V8, which means fewer libraries and community resources are available.
  • Performance
    While QuickJS is efficient, it may not deliver the same high-performance execution as more mature engines like V8, especially in applications requiring intensive computational processing.
  • Lack of Long-term Support
    QuickJS may not have the same level of long-term support and ongoing development as larger projects maintained by large companies or communities.
  • Single-threaded
    QuickJS runs in a single thread, which can be a limitation for applications that require multithreading support for parallel processing.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    Compared to more popular JavaScript engines, QuickJS has fewer debugging tools and integrations, which might make development and troubleshooting more challenging.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

awesome
QuickJS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, awesome (awesome.naquadah.org) is good.

Why this product is good

  • Awesome is a highly configurable and extensible window manager for the X Window System. It is designed to be fast, with minimal system resource usage, and to provide a powerful and flexible environment for managing windows. Users appreciate its customizability and scripting capabilities, making it suitable for advanced users who enjoy tweaking their setup.

Recommended for

  • Users who prefer a minimalist desktop environment for efficiency and speed.
  • Advanced users who enjoy customizing their workflow with Lua scripting.
  • Users seeking a tiling window manager to enhance productivity.
  • Developers and power users who appreciate a high degree of control over their window management.

No analysis of QuickJS yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

awesome 4 videos + Add
QuickJS 1 video + Add

Surface Go Review - It’s Awesome

More videos

  • - RICO (PC) - Why it's Awesome - Review
  • - Awesome review of the 80's Hollow Handled Survival Knife!!
  • - My God is Awesome- Charles Jenkins

QuickJS - IO, axios, redaxios, fetch

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
awesome
QuickJS
100% 100%
Window Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
Application And Data
100% 100%
100% 100%
Linux
0% 0%
0% 0%
Development Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using awesome and QuickJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

awesome no reviews yet
QuickJS no reviews yet

We have no reviews of QuickJS yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

awesome 0 mentions
QuickJS 46 mentions

Tracking awesome since Mar 2021.

  • Vim 9.2 Released
    You don't need V8 for running JS for scripting, you have quickjs[1] or mquickjs[2] for example. You might have problems importing npm packages, but as we can see from lua plugins you don't even need support for package managers.... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Fabrice Bellard Releases MicroQuickJS
    - QuickJS: https://bellard.org/quickjs/ Legendary. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Building a JavaScript Runtime from Scratch using C
    For those who would like a true "from scratch" implementation of JavaScript, Fabrice Bellard's QuickJS [1] is clean, readable and approachable. It's a full implementation of modern JavaScript in a straightforward project, not nearly as... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

View more

Alternatives to awesome and QuickJS

When comparing awesome and QuickJS, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...