Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Authorize.net VS SOAPEngine

Compare Authorize.net VS SOAPEngine and see what are their differences

Authorize.net

Payment gateway enables internet merchants to accept online payments via credit card and e-check.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
SOAPEngine

This generic SOAP client allows you to access web services using a your iOS app, Mac OS X app and AppleTV app. - priore/SOAPEngine

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
VaultNow
All-in-one crypto finance platform for companies that run on stablecoins. Invoicing, payouts, treasury, budgets and AML — the whole money path in one non-custodial system. No banking friction, no spreadsheet reconciliation. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Authorize.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 100 times since March 2021.

social mentions
100 vs 0
Online Payments popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Authorize.net
SOAPEngine
Website authorize.net github.com
Pricing
Official pricing
—
Company Startup from the United States —
Listed in
Online Payments Payment Platform Recurring Billing Payments +1
Mobile Development

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Authorize.net 6 features
SOAPEngine 4 features
  • Wide Acceptance and Trust
    Authorize.net is one of the most established payment gateways on the market, leading to high trust and wide acceptance among merchants and customers alike.
  • Comprehensive Support
    They offer 24/7 customer support through phone, chat, and email, ensuring that your business can receive assistance at any time.
  • Versatility
    The platform supports a wide range of payment methods, including credit cards, eChecks, and digital payments like Apple Pay and PayPal.
  • Security
    Authorize.net provides advanced fraud detection and security features, such as AVS (Address Verification Service), CVV2, and IP filtering.
  • Developer Tools
    They offer robust APIs and an extensive range of developer tools to facilitate custom integrations and application development.
  • Recurring Billing
    Authorize.net supports recurring billing, making it easier for businesses offering subscription services to manage payments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Authorize.net charges a monthly gateway fee, per-transaction fee, and a daily batch fee, which can add up, especially for smaller businesses.
  • Complex Setup
    Setting up Authorize.net can be complicated for non-technical users, requiring some level of technical expertise to configure properly.
  • Limited International Support
    Authorize.net's international support is limited, making it less ideal for businesses looking to operate in multiple countries.
  • Account Approval Process
    The approval process for setting up an Authorize.net account can be lengthy and requires thorough documentation, which could be a drawback for businesses needing a quick setup.
  • Interface Usability
    Some users find the user interface to be outdated and less intuitive compared to newer payment gateways.
  • Comprehensive SOAP Support
    SOAPEngine provides robust and thorough support for SOAP-based web services, making it easier for developers to integrate complex SOAP operations in their applications.
  • iOS and macOS Compatibility
    It is designed to work seamlessly with iOS and macOS platforms, ensuring that developers can build applications across Apple’s ecosystem using SOAP services.
  • Easy Integration
    SOAPEngine is relatively straightforward to integrate into existing projects, providing a variety of functionalities needed to quickly start consuming SOAP web services.
  • Automatic XML Parsing
    The library handles the parsing of XML responses automatically, which simplifies the developer's job by abstracting away the complexity of handling XML data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Apple Platforms
    SOAPEngine is specifically designed for iOS and macOS, making it unsuitable for developers targeting cross-platform solutions that include Android or other systems.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users might find the documentation for SOAPEngine outdated or lacking clarity, potentially complicating the learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on SOAP Protocol
    As SOAP is an older protocol compared to REST, developers using SOAPEngine are tied to using SOAP services, which might not be the best fit for newer web service designs.
  • Performance Overheads
    SOAP can introduce performance overheads due to its verbose nature and the XML format, potentially affecting the performance of applications using SOAPEngine.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Authorize.net
SOAPEngine

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Authorize.net is generally regarded as a good option for businesses looking for a secure and reliable payment gateway. It has a long-standing history in the industry and offers comprehensive features that cater to online and in-person payment processing needs.

Why this product is good

  • Authorize.net is considered a reputable payment gateway service due to its reliability, security features, and extensive support options. It offers robust fraud detection, a wide range of payment method support, and an easy-to-use interface, making it a popular choice for businesses of different sizes.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses seeking a reliable payment gateway.
  • E-commerce platforms that require robust fraud detection and security features.
  • Merchants who need to process a variety of payment types, including credit cards and digital payments.
  • Businesses looking for customizable payment solutions with strong customer support.

Overall verdict

  • SOAPEngine is a solid choice for developers needing SOAP/XML web service integration in Apple ecosystem apps (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS), offering a mature, well-documented library that simplifies working with legacy SOAP-based backends without requiring extensive boilerplate code.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a straightforward Objective-C/Swift API for consuming SOAP web services, abstracting away much of the complexity of manual XML parsing and request construction
  • Supports multiple Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS) making it versatile for cross-platform Apple development
  • Actively maintained with a track record on GitHub, giving developers confidence in its reliability
  • Handles common SOAP complexities like WSDL parsing, authentication, and complex data types
  • Good documentation and examples make it accessible for developers unfamiliar with SOAP intricacies
  • Reduces development time when integrating with older enterprise systems that still rely on SOAP APIs

Recommended for

  • iOS/macOS developers who need to integrate with legacy enterprise SOAP web services
  • Teams maintaining apps that connect to backend systems using WSDL-based services
  • Developers who want to avoid writing manual XML parsing and SOAP envelope construction from scratch
  • Projects requiring cross-platform support across multiple Apple devices with SOAP backend communication
  • Enterprise app developers working in industries (banking, healthcare, government) where SOAP remains a common integration standard

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Authorize.net 3 videos + Add
SOAPEngine 0 videos + Add

PayPal VS Stripe VS Authorize.net?

More videos

  • - Authorize.Net: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
  • - Authorize.net Review Video

No SOAPEngine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Authorize.net
SOAPEngine
100% 100%
Online Payments
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile Development
100% 100%
100% 100%
Payment Platform
0% 0%
100% 100%
Recurring Billing
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Authorize.net and SOAPEngine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Authorize.net 100 mentions
SOAPEngine 0 mentions
  • Authorize.net Plugin Magento2
    I think magento use to come standard with a plugin for authorize.net, but either way I need the official plugin (if one is still maintained) to connect magento2 to authorize.net for payments. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Html, JSON, and Filemaker
    I have a form which can accept payments. The form is hosted by jotform which puts the payment information (collected by an authorize.net widget) into JSON and sends it into my database. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Tired of Stripe and willing to do ACH
    Your local bank likely offers them and they can eb tied to authorize.net, or NMI perhaps. They should be able to help you through that entire process depending on how the accounts get onboarded. Askl your local coffee shop and etc where... Source: about 3 years ago

View more

Tracking SOAPEngine since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Authorize.net and SOAPEngine

When comparing Authorize.net and SOAPEngine, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...