
Supabase
Auth0
Clerk Authentication
Next.js
Clerk
Simple OTP
Shubhra.dev Next.js Auth Kit
Authentication for the Web.

supastarter
Neorepo
NextBase
LaunchFast
SaaSykit
Supaboost - SaaS Starter Template
BoilerBay
Launch Your Next SaaS Faster with staarter.dev
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Auth.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 29 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | authjs.dev | staarter.dev |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Auth.js yet.
A comprehensive Next.js boilerplate that empowers developers to launch their SaaS applications quickly and efficiently. With features like authentication, subscription management, and localization, it provides a solid foundation so you can focus on innovating.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Auth.js yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Clerk vs Next-Auth.js | It's not that simple...
Staarter.dev Coupon Code : Save 50% On Plan
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Auth.js and staarter.dev.
staarter.dev's answer:
Our primary audience consists of developers, solopreneurs, and startups looking to accelerate their SaaS development with a robust, flexible, and scalable boilerplate.
staarter.dev's answer:
staarter.dev is designed to be extendable and vendor-agnostic, allowing you to integrate your preferred tools seamlessly, unlike competitors that lock you into specific providers.
staarter.dev's answer:
staarter.dev offers unparalleled flexibility with multiple vendor integrations and extensive customization options, saving you 40-60 hours of development time on every project.
staarter.dev's answer:
staarter.dev was created out of frustration with repeatedly building the same boilerplate code. We aimed to provide a comprehensive, flexible, and time-saving solution for SaaS development.
staarter.dev's answer:
staarter.dev leverages Next.js, tRPC, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui, next-intl, Zod, and Prisma to provide a modern, scalable, and high-performance SaaS boilerplate.
Share your experience with using Auth.js and staarter.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Auth.js is the Next-native OSS path. Same deal: you own providers, the database adapter, and email. AUTH_SECRET plus OAuth client IDs. Fine if the scaffold is already NextAuth — do not migrate to Clerk “because the blog said so” mid-demo. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
I use libraries for authentication rather than building it myself. For Memoreru, I chose Better Auth. Auth.js is also an option. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Home page | GitHub Repo | Documentation | Discord community. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Tracking staarter.dev since May 2024.
When comparing Auth.js and staarter.dev, you can also consider the following products.


The boilerplate for your next web app built on top of Supabase and Next.js.
Compare supastarter to Auth.js or staarter.dev:

Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
Compare Auth0 to Auth.js or staarter.dev:

Production-ready starter kit for Next.js and Planetscale
Compare Neorepo to Auth.js or staarter.dev:

Clerk is a complete suite of embeddable UIs, flexible APIs, and admin dashboards to authenticate and manage your users.
Compare Clerk Authentication to Auth.js or staarter.dev:

Built your SAAS quickly and skip the boring parts
Compare NextBase to Auth.js or staarter.dev: